Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33458808›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

A qualitative study of online support communities for lung cancer survivors on targeted therapies.

Casey A Walsh, Morhaf Al Achkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Patient and Caregiver Information-seeking in Lung Cancer Treatment: A Real-world Sentiment Analysis of Reddit Communities.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding experiences of cancer-related fatigue in patients with lung cancer after their cancer treatment: a qualitative content analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A qualitative study of interactions with oncologists among patients with advanced lung cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Casey A WalshDepartment of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. cwalsh2@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4926-5301
Morhaf Al AchkarDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4160-0550

Funding

Biobehavioral Cancer Prevention and Control Training Program (BCPT)T32CA092408 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Margaret A Hannon · 2016 to 2026
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS 5T32 CA092408NCI NIH HHS T32 CA092408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to recent treatment advances, people who have non-small cell lung cancer with oncogenic alterations are an important new group of cancer survivors. Little is known about lung cancer online support communities. This research was guided by two primary questions: (1) How do these lung cancer survivors engage in online support communities? and (2) What are the psychological, social, and physical impacts of such engagement?

methodsQualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with patients with advanced lung cancer (N = 40) to learn about their experiences with the illness. We used qualitative thematic analysis, inductive and deductive, as outlined by Carspecken. We adapted the framework for studying online communities developed by Zhang and colleagues to examine engagement with and impacts of involvement in online lung cancer support communities.

resultsParticipants described engaging in the online community through (1) initializing communication through asking questions or sharing resources, (2) responding to others comments or inquiries, or (3) simply observing/reading others posts. Participation had physical, psychological, or social impacts, with benefits (e.g., empowerment) and risks (e.g., feelings of jealousy or misinformation) in each domain. Participants used various strategies to mitigate negative impacts, such as distancing oneself as needed.

conclusionsOnline lung cancer support communities provide support, camaraderie, and specialized health information. However, there are also risks of online engagement, such as social comparison or accessing misinformation. Understanding the utility of online support communities for lung cancer survivors on targeted therapies and further addressing their risks are urgent tasks, especially in the post-COVID era.

Indexed as

Self-Help GroupsAdultAgedCancer SurvivorsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsFemaleHumansInternet-Based InterventionLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationQualitative ResearchALKEGFRLung cancerOnline supportQualitative researchROS1

Identifiers

PMID33458808
PMCPMC7811894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.