Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33458679›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2021

Volatile Sedation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients on Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Ultraprotective Ventilation.

Giacomo Grasselli, Marco Giani, Vittorio Scaravilli, Benedetta Fumagalli, Carminia Mariani, Sara Redaelli, Alberto Lucchini, Alberto Zanella, Nicolò Patroniti, Antonio Pesenti and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giacomo GrasselliDipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Marco GianiDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Vittorio ScaravilliDipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Benedetta FumagalliDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Carminia MarianiDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Sara RedaelliDipartimento di Emergenza-Urgenza, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy.
Alberto LucchiniDipartimento di Emergenza-Urgenza, ASST Monza, Monza, Italy.
Alberto ZanellaDipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Nicolò PatronitiDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, Università di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Antonio PesentiDipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe FotiDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
ASST Melegnano e della Martesana · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients on extracorporeal support for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome may require a prolonged period of deep sedation. In these patients, volatile sedation may represent a valid alternative to IV drugs. The aim of our study was to describe the feasibility of volatile sedation in a large cohort of acute respiratory distress syndrome patients undergoing venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and ultraprotective ventilation.

designRetrospective monocentric study.

settingAdult ICU, ASST Monza, Italy. PATIENTS: Adult patients who underwent volatile sedation with isoflurane during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between 2009 and 2019.

interventionsIsoflurane was delivered via the AnaConDa system. The sedation level, hemodynamics, and laboratory tests were compared between the volatile sedation phase and the IV sedation phases before and after the isoflurane sedation period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsAbout 74 patients (50 yr [43-56 yr]) were included. Median duration of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was 22 days (14-51 d). Volatile sedation started on day 3 (2-6) of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and its median duration was 7 days (4-13 d), ranging from 1 to 38 days. A total of 970 venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation days were analyzed. During the volatile phase, the sedation level was slightly deeper (bispectral index 39 ± 6) compared with the IV phase before and after isoflurane (42 ± 8 and 43 ± 9, respectively,

conclusionsVolatile sedation represents an alternative to IV agents to achieve long-term deep sedation in critically ill patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation undergoing ultraprotective ventilation.

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndromeextracorporeal membrane oxygenationisoflurane; ultraprotective ventilationvolatile sedation

Identifiers

PMID33458679
PMCPMC7803679
OpenAlexW3122829829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.