Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33458649›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural biology: X2021

Contrasting DNA-binding behaviour by ISL1 and LHX3 underpins differential gene targeting in neuronal cell specification.

Ngaio C Smith, Lorna E Wilkinson-White, Ann H Y Kwan, Jill Trewhella, Jacqueline M Matthews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural biology: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ngaio C SmithSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Lorna E Wilkinson-WhiteSydney Analytical Core Research Facility, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Ann H Y KwanSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Jill TrewhellaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Jacqueline M MatthewsSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The roles of ISL1 and LHX3 in the development of spinal motor neurons have been well established. Whereas LHX3 triggers differentiation into interneurons, the additional expression of ISL1 in developing neuronal cells is sufficient to redirect their developmental trajectory towards spinal motor neurons. However, the underlying mechanism of this action by these transcription factors is less well understood. Here, we used electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to probe the different DNA-binding behaviours of these two proteins, both alone and in complexes mimicking those found in developing neurons, and found that ISL1 shows markedly different binding properties to LHX3. We used small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) to structurally characterise DNA-bound species containing ISL1 and LHX3. Taken together, these results have allowed us to develop a model of how these two DNA-binding modules coordinate to regulate gene expression and direct development of spinal motor neurons.

Indexed as

DNA-binding specificityHomeodomain-DNA interactionLIM-homeodomain transcription factorsSAXSTranscriptional complex

Identifiers

PMID33458649
PMCPMC7797366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.