Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33458476›Full record

ArticleACS omega2021

Predicting Air Superficial Velocity of Two-Phase Reactors Using ANFIS and CFD.

Meisam Babanezhad, Mashallah Rezakazemi, Azam Marjani, Saeed Shirazian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meisam BabanezhadInstitute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam.
Mashallah RezakazemiFaculty of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.
Azam MarjaniDepartment for Management of Science and Technology Development, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Saeed ShirazianLaboratory of Computational Modeling of Drugs, South Ural State University, 76 Lenin Prospekt, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In predicting the turbulence property of gas (bubble) flow in the domain of continuous fluid and liquid, the integration of machine learning and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods reduces the overall computational time. This combination enables us to see the effective input parameters in the engineering process and the impact of operating conditions on final outputs, such as gas hold-up, heat and mass transfer, and the flow regime (uniform bubble distribution or nonuniform bubble properties). This paper uses the combination of machine learning and single-size calculation of the Eulerian method to estimate the gas flow distribution in the continuous liquid fluid. To present the machine-learning method besides the Eulerian method, an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is used to train the CFD finding and then estimate the flow based on the machine-learning method. The gas velocity and turbulent eddy dissipation rate are trained throughout the bubble column reactor (BCR) for each CFD node, and the artificial BCR is predicted by the ANFIS method. This smart reactor can represent the artificial CFD of the BCR, resulting in the reduction of expensive numerical simulations. The results showed that the number of inputs could significantly change this method's accuracy, representing the intelligence of method in the learning data set. Additionally, the membership function specifications can impact the accuracy, particularly, when the process is trained with different inputs. The turbulent eddy dissipation rate can also be predicted by the ANFIS method with a similar model pattern for air superficial gas velocity.

Identifiers

PMID33458476
PMCPMC7807482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.