ArticleACS omega2021
Predicting Air Superficial Velocity of Two-Phase Reactors Using ANFIS and CFD.
Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deterministic Models for Performance Analysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass Torrefaction.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Neural-based modeling adsorption capacity of metal organic framework materials with application in wastewater treatment.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Fuzzy Logic, Artificial Neural Network, and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Methodology for Soft Computation and Modeling of Ion Sensing Data of a Terpyridyl-Imidazole Based Bifunctional Receptor.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In predicting the turbulence property of gas (bubble) flow in the domain of continuous fluid and liquid, the integration of machine learning and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods reduces the overall computational time. This combination enables us to see the effective input parameters in the engineering process and the impact of operating conditions on final outputs, such as gas hold-up, heat and mass transfer, and the flow regime (uniform bubble distribution or nonuniform bubble properties). This paper uses the combination of machine learning and single-size calculation of the Eulerian method to estimate the gas flow distribution in the continuous liquid fluid. To present the machine-learning method besides the Eulerian method, an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) is used to train the CFD finding and then estimate the flow based on the machine-learning method. The gas velocity and turbulent eddy dissipation rate are trained throughout the bubble column reactor (BCR) for each CFD node, and the artificial BCR is predicted by the ANFIS method. This smart reactor can represent the artificial CFD of the BCR, resulting in the reduction of expensive numerical simulations. The results showed that the number of inputs could significantly change this method's accuracy, representing the intelligence of method in the learning data set. Additionally, the membership function specifications can impact the accuracy, particularly, when the process is trained with different inputs. The turbulent eddy dissipation rate can also be predicted by the ANFIS method with a similar model pattern for air superficial gas velocity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.