Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33458431›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2019

Target definition in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging only workflow.

Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Emilia Persson, Christian Gustafsson, Elisabeth Kjellén, Petra Ambolt, Silke Engelholm, Per Nilsson, Lars E Olsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Imaging science and development in modern high-precision radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adalsteinn GunnlaugssonDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Emilia PerssonDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Christian GustafssonDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Elisabeth KjellénDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Petra AmboltDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Silke EngelholmDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Per NilssonDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Lars E OlssonDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In magnetic resonance (MR) only radiotherapy, the target delineation needs to be performed without computed tomography (CT). We investigated in thirteen patients with prostate cancer, how the clinical target volume (CTV) was affected, when the target delineation procedure was changed from using both CT and MR images to using MR images only. The mean volume of the CTV

Identifiers

PMID33458431
PMCPMC7807603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.