Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33458418›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2018

Quality assurance of four-dimensional computed tomography in a multicentre trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy of centrally located lung tumours.

Marie Lambrecht, Jan-Jakob Sonke, Ursula Nestle, Heike Peulen, Damien C Weber, Marcel Verheij, Coen W Hurkmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 4DCT is long overdue for improvement.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020
    Article
  11. Imaging science and development in modern high-precision radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marie LambrechtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jan-Jakob SonkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherland Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ursula NestleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Heike PeulenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Damien C WeberCenter for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen, Switzerland.
Marcel VerheijDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherland Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Coen W HurkmansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeExtensive radiation therapy quality assurance (RTQA) programs are needed when advanced radiotherapy treatments are used. As part of the RTQA four dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) imaging performance needs to be assessed. Here we present the RTQA data related to 4DCT procedures used within the context of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of centrally located lung tumours. It provides an overview of the 4DCT acquisition methods and achievable accuracy of imaging lung tumour volumes. MATERIALS AND

methods3DCT and 4DCT images were acquired from a CIRS phantom with spheres of 7.5 and 12.5 mm radius using the institutional scan protocols. Regular asymmetric tumour motion was simulated with varying amplitudes and periods. Target volumes were reconstructed using auto-contouring with scanner specific thresholds. Volume and amplitudes deviations were assessed.

resultsAlthough acquisition parameters were rather homogeneous over the eleven institutions analysed, volume deviations were observed. Average volume deviations for the 12.5 mm sphere were 15% (-4% to 69%) at end of inspiration, 2% (-2% to 9.0%) at end of expiration and 12% (0% to 36%) at mid-ventilation. For the 7.5 mm sphere deviations were 13% (-99% to 65%), 16% (-34% to 66%) and 1% (-13% to 20%), respectively. The amplitude deviation was generally within 2 mm although underestimations up to 6 mm were observed.

conclusionsThe expiration phase was the most accurate phase to define the tumour volume and should be preferred for GTV delineation of tumours exhibiting large motion causing motion artefacts when using mid-ventilation or tracking techniques. The large variation found among the institutions indicated that further improvements in 4DCT imaging were possible. Recommendations for 4DCT QA have been formulated.

Indexed as

4DCTClinical trialEORTCLung cancerRadiotherapy quality assuranceTumour motion

Identifiers

PMID33458418
PMCPMC7807606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.