ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2018
Quality assurance of four-dimensional computed tomography in a multicentre trial of stereotactic body radiotherapy of centrally located lung tumours.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A phantom study of internal target volume and mid-position accuracy in adaptive and conventional four-dimensional computed tomography across regular and irregular motion.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Development of a novel 3D-printed dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom for evaluation of four-dimensional computed tomography.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Optimized raw data selection for artifact reduction of breathing controlled four-dimensional sequence scanning.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Results of a multicenter 4D computed tomography quality assurance audit: Evaluating image accuracy and consistency.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- 4DCT is long overdue for improvement.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Patient-specific respiratory motion management using lung tumors vs fiducial markers for real-time tumor-tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- A comprehensive quality assurance procedure for 4D CT commissioning and periodic QA.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Quality assurance of a breathing controlled four-dimensional computed tomography algorithm.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- Contribution of Imaging to Organs at Risk Dose during Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2021Article
- Independent review of 4DCT scans used for SABR treatment planning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020Article
- Imaging science and development in modern high-precision radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeExtensive radiation therapy quality assurance (RTQA) programs are needed when advanced radiotherapy treatments are used. As part of the RTQA four dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) imaging performance needs to be assessed. Here we present the RTQA data related to 4DCT procedures used within the context of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of centrally located lung tumours. It provides an overview of the 4DCT acquisition methods and achievable accuracy of imaging lung tumour volumes. MATERIALS AND
methods3DCT and 4DCT images were acquired from a CIRS phantom with spheres of 7.5 and 12.5 mm radius using the institutional scan protocols. Regular asymmetric tumour motion was simulated with varying amplitudes and periods. Target volumes were reconstructed using auto-contouring with scanner specific thresholds. Volume and amplitudes deviations were assessed.
resultsAlthough acquisition parameters were rather homogeneous over the eleven institutions analysed, volume deviations were observed. Average volume deviations for the 12.5 mm sphere were 15% (-4% to 69%) at end of inspiration, 2% (-2% to 9.0%) at end of expiration and 12% (0% to 36%) at mid-ventilation. For the 7.5 mm sphere deviations were 13% (-99% to 65%), 16% (-34% to 66%) and 1% (-13% to 20%), respectively. The amplitude deviation was generally within 2 mm although underestimations up to 6 mm were observed.
conclusionsThe expiration phase was the most accurate phase to define the tumour volume and should be preferred for GTV delineation of tumours exhibiting large motion causing motion artefacts when using mid-ventilation or tracking techniques. The large variation found among the institutions indicated that further improvements in 4DCT imaging were possible. Recommendations for 4DCT QA have been formulated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.