Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33458413›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2018

Advantages of intensity modulated proton therapy during hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy.

Joshua Stoker, Sujay Vora, Ameet Patel, David Grosshans, Paul D Brown, Tamara Vern-Gross, Martin Bues, Thomas Daniels, Bryce Allred, Arielle Uejo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua StokerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Sujay VoraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Ameet PatelDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
David GrosshansDivision of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Paul D BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Tamara Vern-GrossDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Martin BuesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Thomas DanielsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Bryce AllredDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Arielle UejoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Heidi KosiorekDepartment of Research Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Marlene BrusoDepartment of Research Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Sameer KeoleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USWinnMed · USMayo Clinic Hospital · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIntensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) allows for modulation parameterized for individual beamlets by position, intensity, and depth. This modulation capability is ideally suited for sparing organs at risk intermediate of the radiation target, such as hippocampal volumes within the whole brain. This work compared IMPT relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) during hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA WBRT). MATERIALS AND

methodsTen adult and ten pediatric patients previously treated for central nervous system malignancies were identified. IMPT and VMAT treatment plans employing HA WBRT were generated for each patient, delivering 30 GyE (Gray Equivalent) in 10 fractions for adults and 36 GyE in 20 fractions for pediatrics. Dose indices, including dose volume histogram metrics and homogeneity index HI = [D5% - D95%]/[D

resultsIMPT offered significant benefits relative to VMAT for hippocampal sparing. Hippocampal mean dose was reduced from 13.7 ± 0.8 Gy with VMAT to 5.4 ± 0.3 GyE using IMPT for pediatrics, and was reduced from 11.7 ± 0.9 Gy with VMAT to 4.4 ± 0.2 GyE using IMPT for adults. IMPT similarly lowered left hippocampal mean dose. Dose to 95% of the clinical target volume was statistically equivalent for both groups; however IMPT reduced the homogeneity index by roughly half.

conclusionThis manuscript demonstrates that HA IMPT can match or exceed dosimetric benefits offered with modulated X-rays. Inclusion of IMPT in future prospective studies is warranted.

Indexed as

Hippocampal sparingIntensity modulated proton therapyRTOG 0933Whole brain radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID33458413
PMCPMC7807533
OpenAlexW2902994040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.