Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33458410›Full record

ReviewPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2018

Multimodal imaging for radiation therapy planning in patients with primary prostate cancer.

Constantinos Zamboglou, Matthias Eiber, Thomas R Fassbender, Matthias Eder, Simon Kirste, Michael Bock, Oliver Schilling, Kathrin Reichel, Uulke A van der Heide, Anca L Grosu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Imaging science and development in modern high-precision radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Constantinos ZamboglouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Matthias EiberDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany.
Thomas R FassbenderDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Matthias EderDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Simon KirsteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Michael BockDivision of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Oliver SchillingInstitute of Surgical Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Kathrin ReichelDepartment of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Uulke A van der HeideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anca L GrosuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation of advanced imaging techniques like multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) or Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in radiation therapy (RT) planning of patients with primary prostate cancer demands several preconditions: accurate staging of the extraprostatic and intraprostatic tumor mass, robust delineation of the intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) and a reproducible characterization of the prostate cancer's biological properties. In the current review we searched for the currently available imaging techniques and we discussed their ability to fulfill these preconditions. We found that current pretreatment imaging was mainly performed with mpMRI and/or Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging. Both techniques offered an accurate detection of the extraprostatic and intraprostatic tumor burden and had a major impact on RT concepts. However, some studies postulated that mpMRI and PSMA PET had complementary information for intraprostatic GTV detection. Moreover, interobserver differences for intraprostatic tumor delineation based on mpMRI were observed. It is currently unclear whether PET based GTV delineation underlies also interobserver heterogeneity. Further research is warranted to answer whether multimodal imaging is able to visualize biological processes related to prostate cancer pathophysiology and radiation resistance.

Identifiers

PMID33458410
PMCPMC7807571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.