Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33458406›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2018

Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-only rectum radiotherapy with a commercial synthetic computed tomography generation solution.

Matteo Maspero, Marcus D Tyyger, Rob H N Tijssen, Peter R Seevinck, Martijn P W Intven, Cornelis A T van den Berg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Multicentre, deep learning, synthetic-CT generation for ano-rectal MR-only radiotherapy treatment planning.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Imaging science and development in modern high-precision radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2019
    Article
  19. The rationale for MR-only treatment planning for external radiotherapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matteo MasperoDepartment of Radiotherapy, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marcus D TyygerLeeds Teaching Hospital, Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Rob H N TijssenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter R SeevinckImage Science Institute, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martijn P W IntvenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelis A T van den BergDepartment of Radiotherapy, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSynthetic computed tomography (sCT) images enable magnetic resonance (MR)-based dose calculations. This work investigated whether a commercially available sCT generation solution was suitable for accurate dose calculations and position verification on patients with rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND

methodsFor twenty rectal cancer patients computed tomography (CT) images were rigidly registered to sCT images. Clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were recalculated on registered CT and sCT images. Dose deviations were determined through gamma and voxelwise analysis. The impact on position verification was investigated by identifying differences in translations and rotation between cone-beam CT (CBCT) to CT and CBCT to sCT registrations.

resultsAcross twenty patients, within a threshold of 90% of the prescription dose, a gamma analysis (2%, 2 mm) mean pass rate of 95.2 ± 4.0% (±1

conclusionsAccurate MR-based dose calculations using a commercial sCT generation method were clinically feasible for treatment of rectal cancer patients. The accuracy of position verification was clinically acceptable. However, before clinical implementation future investigations will be performed to determine the origin of the systematic shift.

Indexed as

CTDose calculationIGRTImage-guided radiotherapyMedical imagingMRMRIMR-only radiotherapyPosition verification

Identifiers

PMID33458406
PMCPMC7807733
OpenAlexW2895336991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.