ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2020
Dose-response of deformable radiochromic dosimeters for spot scanning proton therapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiation-Sensitive Nano-, Micro-, and Macro-Gels and Polymer Capsules for Use in Radiotherapy Dosimetry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Motion-induced dose perturbations in photon radiotherapy and proton therapy measured by deformable liver-shaped 3D dosimeters in an anthropomorphic phantom.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- 3D Polymer Gel Dosimeters with iCBCT 3D Reading and polyGeVero-CT Software Package for Quality Assurance in Radiotherapy.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A review of the clinical introduction of 4D particle therapy research concepts.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Characterisation and Quenching Correction for an AlSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Optically stimulated luminescence in state-of-the-art LYSO:Ce scintillators enables high spatial resolution 3D dose imaging.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Empirical quenching correction in radiochromic silicone-based three-dimensional dosimetry of spot-scanning proton therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrafractional motion and deformation influence proton therapy delivery for tumours in the thorax, abdomen and pelvis. This study aimed to test the dose-response of a compressively strained three-dimensional silicone-based radiochromic dosimeter during proton beam delivery. The dosimeter was read-out in its relaxed state using optical computed tomography and calibrated for the linear energy transfer, based on Monte Carlo simulations. A three-dimensional gamma analysis showed a 99.3% pass rate for 3%/3 mm and 93.9% for 2%/2 mm, for five superimposed measurements using deformation-including Monte Carlo dose calculations as reference. We conclude that the dosimeter's dose-response is unaffected by deformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.