ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2020
Dosimetric and geometric end-to-end accuracy of a magnetic resonance guided linear accelerator.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A new perspective on radiotherapy in the comprehensive treatment of cancer.Precision radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Characterizing the motion management system accuracy on a 1.5T MR-Linac.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2025Article
- 3D gel dosimeter assessment for end-to-end geometric accuracy determination of the online adaptive workflow on the 1.5 T MR-linac.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Real-time radial reconstruction with domain transform manifold learning for MRI-guided radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Clinical commissioning of an adaptive radiotherapy platform: Results and recommendations.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Evaluation of an anthropomorphic ion chamber and 3D gel dosimetry head phantom at a 0.35 T MR-linac using separate 1.5 T MR-scanners for gel readout.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2022Article
- Quality assurance for on-table adaptive magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy: A software tool to complement secondary dose calculation and failure modes discovered in clinical routine.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Experimental evaluation of four-dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for radiotherapy planning of lung cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2021Article
- Technical Challenges of Real-Time Adaptive MR-Guided Radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of real-time imaging by magnetic resonance guided linear accelerators (MR-Linacs) enabled adaptive treatments and gating on the tumor position. Different end-to-end tests monitored the accuracy of our MR-Linac during the first year of clinical operation. We report on the stability of these tests covering a static, adaptive and gating workflow. Film measurements showed gamma passing rates of 96.4% ± 3.4% for the static tests (five measurements) and for the two adaptive tests 98.9% and 99.99%, respectively (criterion 2%/2mm). The gated point dose measurements in the breathing phantom were 2.7% lower than in the static phantom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.