Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33458328›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2020

A study of the clinical, treatment planning and dosimetric feasibility of dose painting in external beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Steve W Blake, Alison Stapleton, Andrew Brown, Sian Curtis, Janice Ash-Miles, Emma Dennis, Susan Masson, Dawn Bowers, Serena Hilman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steve W BlakeMedical Physics, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK.
Alison StapletonMedical Physics, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK.
Andrew BrownMedical Physics, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK.
Sian CurtisBioengineering, Innovation & Research Hub, Medical Physics, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol BS2 8EG, UK.
Janice Ash-MilesRadiology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
Emma DennisOncology, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK.
Susan MassonOncology, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK.
Dawn BowersOncology, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK.
Serena HilmanOncology, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK.
At Bristol · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBSt Michael's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRadiotherapy dose painting is a promising technique which enables dose escalation to areas of higher tumour cell density within the prostate which are associated with radioresistance, known as dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs). The aim of this study was to determine factors affecting the feasibility of radiotherapy dose painting in patients with high and intermediate risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS &

methodsTwenty patients were recruited into the study for imaging using a 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Identified DILs were outlined and the scan registered with the planning computed tomography (CT) dataset. Intensity-modulated plans were produced and evaluated to determine the effect of the organ-at-risk constraints on the dose that could be delivered to the DILs. Measurements were made to verify that the distribution could be safely delivered.

resultsMRI scans were obtained for nineteen patients. Fourteen patients had one to two DILs with ten overlapping the urethra and/or rectum. The target boost of 86 Gy was achieved in seven plans but was limited to 80 Gy for five patients whose boost volume overlapped or abutted the urethra. Dosimetric measurements gave a satisfactory gamma pass rate at 3%/3 mm.

conclusionsIt was feasible to produce dose-painted plans for a boost of 86 Gy for approximately half the patients with DILs. The main limiting factor was the proximity of the urethra to the boost volumes. For a small proportion of patients, rigid registration between CT and MRI images was not adequate for planning purposes.

Indexed as

Computer-assisted/methodsFeasibility studiesFocal boostIntensity-modulated/methodsMagnetic resonance imagingMulti-parametric MRIProstate radiotherapyRadiotherapyRadiotherapy dosageRadiotherapy planningUrethra

Identifiers

PMID33458328
PMCPMC7807863
OpenAlexW3048234062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.