Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33458318›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2020

Clinical microbeam radiation therapy with a compact source: specifications of the line-focus X-ray tube.

Johanna Winter, Marek Galek, Christoph Matejcek, Jan J Wilkens, Kurt Aulenbacher, Stephanie E Combs, Stefan Bartzsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johanna WinterHelmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Marek GalekUniversity of Applied Sciences, Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Munich, Germany.
Christoph MatejcekTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany.
Jan J WilkensTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany.
Kurt AulenbacherJohannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Institut für Kernphysik, Mainz, Germany.
Stephanie E CombsHelmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Stefan BartzschHelmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMicrobeam radiotherapy (MRT) is a preclinical concept in radiation oncology with arrays of alternating micrometer-wide high-dose peaks and low-dose valleys. Experiments demonstrated a superior normal tissue sparing at similar tumor control rates with MRT compared to conventional radiotherapy. Possible clinical applications are currently limited to large third-generation synchrotrons. Here, we investigated the line-focus X-ray tube as an alternative microbeam source. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed a concept for a high-voltage supply and an electron source. In Monte Carlo simulations, we assessed the influence of X-ray spectrum, focal spot size, electron incidence angle, and photon emission angle on the microbeam dose distribution. We further assessed the dose distribution of microbeam arc therapy and suggested to interpret this complex dose distribution by equivalent uniform dose.

resultsAn adapted modular multi-level converter can supply high-voltage powers in the megawatt range for a few seconds. The electron source with a thermionic cathode and a quadrupole can generate an eccentric, high-power electron beam of several 100 keV energy. Highest dose rates and peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDRs) were achieved for an electron beam impinging perpendicular onto the target surface and a focal spot smaller than the microbeam cross-section. The line-focus X-ray tube simulations demonstrated PVDRs above 20.

conclusionThe line-focus X-ray tube is a suitable compact source for clinical MRT. We demonstrated its technical feasibility based on state-of-the-art high-voltage and electron-beam technology. Microbeam arc therapy is an effective concept to increase the target-to-entrance dose ratio of orthovoltage microbeams.

Indexed as

Compact radiation sourceEquivalent uniform doseLine-focus X-ray tubeMicrobeam arc therapyMicrobeam radiation therapyModular high-voltage supply

Identifiers

PMID33458318
PMCPMC7807643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.