ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2020
Comparison of tumor delineation using dual energy computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer re-irradiation cases.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Low-Energy Virtual Monoenergetic Images Derived From Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Tumor Segmentation for Head and Neck Radiation Therapy: A Contouring Study.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- A comparison of contrast-to-noise ratio of liver tumors between dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and respiration-tracked 4D-CT for radiotherapy targeting.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Deep Learning (nnU-Net)-Based Segmentation of Primary HPV-Positive OPSCC: Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Fat-Suppressed Versus Non-Contrast-Enhanced T2-Weighted Fat-Suppressed MRI (Paired Single-Center Study).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal Imaging to Improve Patient Selection and Optimize Treatment Planning and Delivery for Patients Undergoing Reirradiation: A Scoping Review.Current oncology reports · 2025Article
- The diagnosis value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) multi-parameter imaging in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-generated targets and inter-observer variation in online adaptive radiotherapy of bladder cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Clinical benefit of range uncertainty reduction in proton treatment planning based on dual-energy CT for neuro-oncological patients.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Characterization of positioning uncertainties in PET-CT-MR trimodality solutions for radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Variability in Magnetic Resonance-Guided Delineation of Oropharyngeal Gross Tumor Volumes and High-Risk Clinical Target Volumes: An R-IDEAL Stage 0 Prospective Study.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2022Article
- Improving radiation physics, tumor visualisation, and treatment quantification in radiotherapy with spectral or dual-energy CT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Review
- Optimisation and validation of an integrated magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy planning solution.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2021Article
- Reirradiation: Standards, challenges, and patient-focused strategies across tumor types.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In treatment planning, multiple imaging modalities can be employed to improve the accuracy of tumor delineation but this can be costly. This study aimed to compare the interobserver consistency of using dual energy computed tomography (DECT) versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for delineating tumors in the head and neck cancer (HNC) re-irradiation scenario. Twenty-three patients with recurrent HNC and had planning DECT and MRI were identified. Contoured tumor volumes by seven radiation oncologists were compared. Overall, T1c MRI performed the best with median DSC of 0.58 (0-0.91) for T1c. T1c MRI provided higher interobserver agreement for skull base sites and 60 kV DECT provided higher interobserver agreement for non-skull base sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.