ArticleJournal of patient experience2020
What Are the Priming and Ceiling Effects of One Experience Measure on Another?
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discussing expected long-term quality of life in the ICU: effect on experiences and outcomes of patients, family, and clinicians-a randomized clinical trial.Intensive care medicine · 2025Trial
- Article
- Quality of care experience- aged care consumers (QCE-ACC) in residential aged care: an assessment of construct validity.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Adaptation, further development and evaluation of the measurement properties of the person-centred community care inventory (PERCCI-S) for use in the Swedish municipal health care system.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Visual CARE Measure for assessing children's perceptions of nurses' empathy.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of the brief patient-reported experience measure consideRATE within the hospital setting for patients with palliative care needs, their families/carers and clinicians.Palliative medicine · 2025Article
- Patient-Reported Experiences of Persistent Post-COVID-19 Conditions After Hospital Discharge During the Second and Third Waves of the Pandemic in Switzerland: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- The Impact of a Pediatric Continuity Care Intensivist Program on Patient and Parent Outcomes: An Unblinded Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pediatric intensive care · 2024Article
- Validation of an Inhaled Therapy Beliefs Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Universal pictures: A lithophane codex helps teenagers with blindness visualize nanoscopic systems.Science advances · 2024Article
- Using a health equity lens to measure patient experiences of care in diverse health care settings.PloS one · 2024Article
- Recall of Psychotherapy Information and Immersiveness in a Virtual Reality Application for Cancer-Related Chronic Pain.Journal of medical extended reality · 2024Article
- The added value of the artificial intelligence patient-reported experience measure (AI-PREM tool) in clinical practise: Deployment in a vestibular schwannoma care pathway.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Perspectives of inpatients with palliative care needs, their families, clinicians and key stakeholders on measuring quality of hospital care via patient experience measures: A qualitative study.Palliative medicine · 2023Article
- Predictors of Healthcare Workers' Compassionate Care Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study from Patients' Perspective in Kelantan, Malaysia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- The Rasch Analysis Shows Poor Construct Validity and Low Reliability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0) Questionnaire.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Validation and Translation of the Relational Aspect of Care Questionnaire into the Malay Language (RAC-QM) to Evaluate the Compassionate Care Level of Healthcare Workers from the Patient's Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Patient and provider perceptions of a peer-delivered intervention ('Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-reported experience measures have notable ceiling effects which can hinder efforts to learn and improve. This study tested whether an iterative (Guttman-style) satisfaction questionnaire combined with instructions intended to give people agency to critique us primes responses on an ordinal scale and reduces ceiling effects. Among the 161 subjects randomly assigned to complete an iterative satisfaction questionnaire before or after an ordinal scale, there was no difference in mean satisfaction (no priming). The Guttman scale was more normally distributed and had slightly less ceiling effect when compared to the ordinal scale. Iterative satisfaction scales partially mitigate ceiling effects. The absence of priming suggests that attempts to encourage agency and reflection have limited ability to reduce ceiling effects, and alternative approaches should be tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.