The Association Between Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Scores and Preference for Specific Interventions.

Emily Z Boersma, Joost T P Kortlever, Michael D Loeb, John McDonald, Gregg A Vagner, David Ring, Matt Driscoll

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Mental Health Among People Presenting for Care of Physical Symptoms: The Factors Associated with Suicidality and Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety are Similar Across Specialties.Chronic stress (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily Z BoersmaDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

Joost T P KortleverDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3825-5546

Michael D LoebTexas orthopedics, Midtown Medical II Building, Austin, TX, USA.

John McDonaldTexas orthopedics, Midtown Medical II Building, Austin, TX, USA.

Gregg A VagnerOrthopedic specialists of Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

David RingDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5947-5316

Matt DriscollAustin Regional Clinic, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine whether greater patient-reported symptom intensity and functional limitation influence expressed preferences for discretionary diagnostic and treatment interventions, we studied the association of patient factors and several Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) scores with patient preferences for diagnostic and treatment interventions before and after the visit, a cross-sectional cohort study. One hundred and forty-three adult patients who completed several PROMs were asked their preferences for diagnostic and treatment interventions before and after a visit with an orthopedic surgeon. Patients with better physical function had fewer preferences for specific diagnostic interventions after the visit (

Indexed as

clinician–patient relationshipcommunicationmedical decision-makingpatient expectations

Identifiers

PMID33457619

DOI10.1177/2374373519897761

PMCPMC7786652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.