Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33457605›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2020

Perspectives on Patient Experience: A National Survey of Hospitalists.

Rafina Khateeb, Angela Keniston, Amber Moore, Christine Hrach, Kimberly A Indovina, Patrick Kneeland, Mark Rudolph, Marisha Burden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rafina KhateebDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-6415
Angela KenistonDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Amber MooreDivision of Hospital Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Christine HrachDivision of Hospitalist Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Kimberly A IndovinaDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Patrick KneelandDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Mark RudolphSound Physicians, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Marisha BurdenDivision of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite efforts to improve patient experience (PX), little is known about the perspective of hospitalists regarding PX initiatives and priorities. A survey was distributed to hospitalist groups across the country assessing involvement in PX initiatives and their perceived effectiveness, what PX means to providers, and facilitators/barriers in improving PX. Ninety-nine percent of respondents had encountered some improvement activity around PX. The most prevalent were communication training, group Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems data, and interdisciplinary bedside rounding. Respondents rated most initiatives a 5 to 6 out of 10 for their effectiveness, with the perception of effectiveness increasing with respondents' assessment of patient experience priority. Learning about others' experiences in improving PX and learning about potential collaborations for quality improvement or research in these areas were areas of interest for future work. Qualitative work highlighted potential barriers in improving PX such as workload and staffing constraints, uncontrollable environmental factors, and unrealistic patient expectations. Improving PX is a priority, and there are many initiatives in place with perceived variable success and perceived barriers in improving PX.

Indexed as

communicationHCAHPShospitalistspatient expectationsqualitative methodsquantitative methods

Identifiers

PMID33457605
PMCPMC7786688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.