ArticleJournal of patient experience2020
Patients' Experiences of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- A new way of thinking? Exploring professionals' perspectives on the sustainability of interprofessional team meetings: A focus group study.The European journal of general practice · 2026Article
- The perceptions of Dutch general practitioners on the implementation of a proactive integrated care approach for patients with complex needs: a pilot survey.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Women's Satisfaction with Gynecological Healthcare Services in a Public Tertiary Facility: A Questionnaire Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Patient experiences with collaborative practices between primary and specialized care in Norwegian cancer pathways: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Cross-sectional study of interprofessional collaboration among Japanese nurse practitioners.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Working together: development of a genetic counselling curriculum in a medical genetics residency training program.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Patient experience and primary care teams: a cross-sectional survey of French elderly patients.BMJ open · 2025Article
- How patients experience nurse-doctor collaborative care at specialist clinics: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Patients' views on primary care multidisciplinary teams in Scotland: a mixed-methods evaluation.BJGP open · 2024Article
- Patients' experiences of medication management while navigating ongoing care between outpatient services: A qualitative case study of patients on hemodialysis.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- "The patients first and foremost" collaborative practice in the Australian healthcare system: a qualitative study.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2024Article
- Expanding general practice with interprofessional teams: a mixed-methods patient perspective study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Beyond shadowing: Active involvement of pre-health undergraduate students in patient- and family-centered rounds.Journal of interprofessional care · 2023Observational
- Qualitative examination of collaboration in team-based primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMJ open · 2023Article
- What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review.BMC primary care · 2022Review
- Impact of a Pharmacist-Led Chronic Disease State Management Clinic on Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- Patient perspectives on quality of care for depression and anxiety in primary health care teams: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals Toward Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care Settings in a Middle Eastern Country.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2021Article
- Background and Foreground: Connections and Distinctions When Health Professions Faculty Teach Both Interprofessional Collaborative Practice and Quality Improvement-A Case Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) has been shown to improve patient safety and quality of care. Particularly, IPC assists health care providers to manage complex and chronic diseases. To this end, primary care centers around the world have begun practicing IPC; however, little is known about the patient's experience of IPC in primary care (IPC-pc). The goals of this scoping review were to identify the studies exploring patients' perspectives on IPC-pc and to reveal gaps in the literature for future research in order to inform policy and practice. A key word search strategy was conducted using PubMed to identify studies published from 1997 to 2017 on IPC-pc that included data collected from patients or their caregivers about patient experience or satisfaction. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria for the scoping review, and these studies were evaluated by interprofessional intervention, collaboration, and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.