ReviewJournal of patient experience2020
Patient and Family Experience in a Multidisciplinary Clinic for Children With Single-Ventricle Heart Disease.
Review in Journal of patient experience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Practices and Variations Among Pediatric Severe Asthma Programs in the United States-The North American Severe Pediatric Asthma Consortium.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Observational
- Evaluation of multidisciplinary high-risk pregnancy clinic for myelomeningocele.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Qualitative feedback from caregivers in a multidisciplinary pediatric neuromuscular clinic.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of Ventricular Dominance on Long-Term Fontan Outcomes: A 25-year Single-institution Study.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with single-ventricle heart disease (SVHD) are at risk for morbidity across multiple organ systems. A single-ventricle multidisciplinary clinic (SVMDC) may address complex health-care needs by providing access to, and coordination among, pediatric subspecialties. However, the patient and family experience of multidisciplinary care for SVHD remains unexplored. We e-mailed a 26-question survey to families after an SVMDC visit, which included evaluation with subspecialists from cardiology, pulmonology, gastroenterology, neuropsychology, and pediatric psychology, as well as social activities during clinic. Responses were anonymized to protect privacy, and data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Over 3 years, 22% (27/122) of families completed the survey. Overall, families' experiences were positive, with 100% reporting that they would recommend the SVMDC to others. Qualitative themes emerged regarding logistics, multidisciplinary care, key takeaways from clinic, and connection-making with other families. A multidisciplinary clinic demonstrated overall acceptability and perceived benefit to families of children with SVHD. Considerations for mixed experiences regarding financial commitment and connection-making among parents are discussed, as are the benefits of the synergy achieved through multidisciplinary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.