Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33457547›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2020

Analysis of the Experience-Based Design Feedback Data on a National Scale.

Sakib Rahman, Deborah Thompson, Alice Clayton, Simon Conroy, Matt Tite

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sakib RahmanJoondalup Health Campus, Putney, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9905-038X
Deborah ThompsonAcute Frailty Network, London, United Kingdom.
Alice ClaytonJoondalup Health Campus, Putney, London, United Kingdom.
Simon ConroyUniversity of Leicester Hospitals Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Matt TiteJoondalup Health Campus, Putney, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United Kingdom Office of National Statistics population estimates that 10 million people are aged 65 years and older, of which some would be considered frail. This is conceptualized as a complex progressive loss of physiological and social function. In order to establish and evaluate appropriate services, feedback tools designed for this patient group have begun to take greater importance, which the Acute Frailty Network has been developing using experience-based design. These tools focus on the experience of frail patients in the settings of accident and emergency and the acute medical unit. An analysis of data from 12 hospitals was used to look at the common emotions and comments expressed at the key touchpoints. A total of 609 respondents were used in the analysis, revealing that patients expressed mostly positive experiences. The areas with the most negative emotions and comments were in the domains "being admitted," "first assessment," and "preparing to leave hospital." We would recommend that future quality improvement projects focus in improving the communication standards around the admission and discharge process.

Indexed as

clinician–patient relationshippatient expectationspatient feedbackpatient perspectives/narrativespatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID33457547
PMCPMC7786651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.