Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33457515›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2020

Integrative Review of the Interventions for Improving Patients' Experiences Revealed in Quality Improvement Projects.

Jin Jun, Kailyn Stern, Maja Djukic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jin JunSchool of Nursing and the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7510-7441
Kailyn SternUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA.
Maja DjukicRory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) is the first national, standardized, publicly reported survey of patients' perspectives of hospital care closely linked to hospitals' reimbursement and reputation. Thus, it is critical to learn about what interventions work for improving HCAHPS. Eight peer-reviewed studies examining nursing-led interventions at improving patient satisfaction in hospitals, measured by the HCAHPS, were identified. Using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program for cohort studies, each study was evaluated for a level of evidence. Interventions that increased HCAHPS were (1) nursing rounds, (2) the use of discharge nurses, (3) follow-up phone calls by nurses, and (4) continuing education for nurses. However, the quality of evidence is low and based on single-site, pre-postdesign studies. Hospital leaders should focus their efforts on a combination of nurse rounding, comprehensive discharge planning to improve patients' overall experience with hospital care, and their likelihood to recommend the hospital.

Indexed as

HCAHPSnurse roundingnursingpatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID33457515
PMCPMC7786761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.