Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33457489›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2020

Translational animal models for Alzheimer's disease: An Alzheimer's Association Business Consortium Think Tank.

Michael P Vitek, Joseph A Araujo, Michael Fossel, Barry D Greenberg, Gareth R Howell, Stacey J Sukoff Rizzo, Nicholas T Seyfried, Andrea J Tenner, Paul R Territo, Manfred Windisch and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Brain and retina in Alzheimer's disease: Pathological intersections and estimates from imaging.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Antiamnesic and Neurotrophic Effects ofBehavioural neurology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michael P VitekCognosci, Inc Durham North Carolina USA.
Joseph A AraujoInterVivo Solutions Inc Fergus Ontario Canada.
Michael FosselTelocyte LLC Grand Rapids Michigan USA.
Barry D GreenbergDepartment of Neurology Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USA.
Gareth R HowellThe Jackson Laboratory Bar Harbor Maine USA.
Stacey J Sukoff RizzoAging Institute University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Nicholas T SeyfriedDepartments of Biochemistry and Neurology Emory School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA.
Andrea J TennerDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry University of California Irvine California USA.
Paul R TerritoIndiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA.
Manfred WindischNeuroScios GmbH Willersdorferstrasse 7, St. Radegund Austria.
Lisa J BainIndependent Science and Medical Writer Elverson Pennsylvania USA.
April RossFormer Alzheimer's Association Employee Chicago Illinois USA.
Maria C CarrilloAlzheimer's Association Chicago Illinois USA.
Bruce T LambIndiana University School of Medicine Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Indianapolis Indiana USA.
Rebecca M EdelmayerAlzheimer's Association Chicago Illinois USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 5 million Americans and 50 million individuals worldwide are living with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The progressive dementia associated with AD currently has no cure. Although clinical trials in patients are ultimately required to find safe and effective drugs, animal models of AD permit the integration of brain pathologies with learning and memory deficits that are the first step in developing these new drugs. The purpose of the Alzheimer's Association Business Consortium Think Tank meeting was to address the unmet need to improve the discovery and successful development of Alzheimer's therapies. We hypothesize that positive responses to new therapies observed in validated models of AD will provide predictive evidence for positive responses to these same therapies in AD patients. To achieve this goal, we convened a meeting of experts to explore the current state of AD animal models, identify knowledge gaps, and recommend actions for development of next-generation models with better predictability. Among our findings, we all recognize that models reflecting only single aspects of AD pathogenesis do not mimic AD. Models or combinations of new models are needed that incorporate genetics with environmental interactions, timing of disease development, heterogeneous mechanisms and pathways, comorbidities, and other pathologies that lead to AD and related dementias. Selection of the best models requires us to address the following: (1) which animal species, strains, and genetic backgrounds are most appropriate; (2) which models permit efficient use throughout the drug development pipeline; (3) the translatability of behavioral-cognitive assays from animals to patients; and (4) how to match potential AD therapeutics with particular models. Best practice guidelines to improve reproducibility also need to be developed for consistent use of these models in different research settings. To enhance translational predictability, we discuss a multi-model evaluation strategy to de-risk the successful transition of pre-clinical drug assets to the clinic.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseanimal modelsAPOEdrug developmentEOADLOADtransgenictranslationalTREM2

Identifiers

PMID33457489
PMCPMC7798310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.