Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33457391›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2021

Initial experiences of robotic SP cholecystectomy: a comparative analysis with robotic Si single-site cholecystectomy.

Charles Jimenez Cruz, Frederick Huynh, Incheon Kang, Woo Jung Lee, Chang Moo Kang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05051670 (The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using da Vinci SP for Early Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05051670 nacompletednot on this map

The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using da Vinci SP for Early Gastric Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled19ConditionsGastric CancerArmsda vinc SP gastrectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Application of the Da Vinci Single-Port (SP) Robot in General Surgery: A First Systematic Review.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.

Charles Jimenez CruzLiver and Pancreas Center, Department of Surgery, The Medical City Clark, Mabalacat, Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1184-1174
Frederick HuynhHepatoPancreatoBiliary Service, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5995-3998
Incheon KangHepatoPancreatoBiliary Service, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4236-5094
Woo Jung LeeDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9273-261X
Chang Moo KangDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-4658
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe da Vinci SP robotic surgical system (Intuitive Surgical) offers pure SP with 4 lumens, which accommodates the fully-wristed endoscope and 3 arms with multijoint feature. We herein present our initial experience of the da Vinci SP surgical system in robotic single-site cholecystectomy.

methodsThirty consecutive patients with a preoperative diagnosis of gallstones and/or chronic cholecystitis who underwent robotic SP cholecystectomy (RSPC) using da Vinci SP surgical system from January to May 2019 were reviewed. The perioperative outcomes were assessed and compared with those performed using Si-robotic single-site surgical system.

resultsMean docking time was 5.2 minutes. The mean actual dissection time was 14.6 minutes while the mean operation time was 75.1 minutes. Postoperative course was unremarkable and patients were discharged after a mean hospital stay of 1.5 days. In comparative analysis, operation time (109.5 ± 30.0 minutes

conclusionRSPC is feasible, safe, and effective. The perioperative outcomes are better compared with Si-robotic single-site surgical systems.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyGallstonesRobotics

Identifiers

PMID33457391
PMCPMC7791187
OpenAlexW3113509793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.