ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2020
Inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer: a contemporary review.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- National penile cancer surgery centralisation in Ireland: five-year service performance, survival, and recurrence outcomes.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and a Stage-Based Analysis of Treatments and Outcomes for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Review
- Patient-reported outcome measures in penile cancer: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2025Review
- Article
- The surgical technique and protocol for dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer at a Southeast Asian regional hospital.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Combined Reporting of Surgical Quality and Cancer Control after Surgical Treatment for Penile Tumors with Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: TheCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer.European urology open science · 2023Article
- Therapeutic Approaches to Penile Cancer: Standards of Care and Recent Developments.Research and reports in urology · 2023Review
- Clinical Application of Noninflating Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Modified Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Groin-Negative Patients of Penile Cancer: Our Experience.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Novel Role Of DSNB in Staging of Primary Urethral Cancer: New Standard?International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
- Re: Kandasamy SG, Chandran KR, Pooleri GK. Minimal invasive approaches in lymph node management of carcinoma of penis: A review. Indian J Urol 2022;38:15-21.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile cancer is an uncommon disease associated with significant psychological and physical morbidity. Penile cancer has an expectable pattern of spread in a stepwise fashion, from inguinal to pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) then distant spread. Patients with penile cancer have variable survival, with patients with a low burden of nodal metastatic disease having lasting survival with surgical management, however patients with a large amount of locoregional metastatic disease having a worse prognosis. The current management options for patients with metastatic lymph node disease in penile cancer aims to reduce the morbidity associated with radical inguinal lymph node (ILN) surgery with appropriate risk stratification to optimise oncological control of the disease. This article describes current challenges in managing the inguinal region in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.