Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33457252›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2020

Glans penis augmentation using hyaluronic acid for the treatment of premature ejaculation: a narrative review.

Fares Kosseifi, Ala Chebbi, Nehme Raad, Antoinette Ndayra, Raed El Samad, Kamal Achkar, Xavier Durand, Antoine Noujeim

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Glans penis augmentation: when, how, and why?International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fares KosseifiDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ala ChebbiDepartment of Urology, Saint-Joseph Hospital, Paris, France.
Nehme RaadDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Antoinette NdayraDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon.
Raed El SamadDepartment of Urology, GHPSO Hospital, Creil, France.
Kamal AchkarDepartment of Urology, GHPSO Hospital, Creil, France.
Xavier DurandDepartment of Urology, Saint-Joseph Hospital, Paris, France.
Antoine NoujeimDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph · FRCentre Hospitalier Laennec · FRLebanese University · LBUniversity of Balamand · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premature ejaculation (PE) is the most common self-reported male sexual disorder estimated to occur in approximately 5% of men in the general community. Penile hypersensitivity is thought to be an etiologic factor of lifelong PE. The role of glans penis augmentation using injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of PE is debatable and remains to be confirmed. The creation of a barrier at the level of the glans, by the bulking agent blocking accessibility and inhibiting the tactile stimuli to reach the dorsal nerve of the penis (branch of the pudendal nerve) receptors, is the theory behind the effectiveness of HA in the field of PE. We reviewed the literature using PubMed and searched for the following keywords: premature ejaculation, glans penis and HA, over the last 20 years. Five studies were found. These studies showed that HA injection could significantly increase IELT (2.43- to 4.46-fold), and this increase could persist for long term (up to 5 years). No serious adverse reactions were reported besides transient discoloration and swelling of the glans that recovered to normal within 2 weeks. Many techniques were discussed, their effectiveness remains to be proved. However, proper patient selection and mastering the esthetics of the technique, by adequate surgical training, is necessary in order to achieve the optimal results.

Indexed as

augmentationglans penisHyaluronic acid (HA)intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT)premature ejaculation (PE)

Identifiers

PMID33457252
PMCPMC7807328
OpenAlexW3107182545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.