ArticleCureus2020
A Simple Modified Technique for Frameless Brain Lesion Biopsy.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Silent Transformation of Stereotactic Brain Biopsies After the Introduction of Robotics.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025Article
- Influence of the Vertek aiming device on the surgical accuracy of computer-assisted drilling of the equine distal sesamoid bone-An experimental cadaveric study.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2025Article
- Stereotactic biopsy for adult brainstem lesions: A surgical approach and its diagnostic value according to the 2016 World Health Organization Classification.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Published articles pertaining to possible ways to increase the accuracy of image-guided frameless surgery are abundant in the literature. Accurate target localization is dependent on many factors, of which noteworthy is the meticulous registration and constant fixation of instruments during the procedure. Frequent changing of instruments' application or inadvertent destabilization of its fixation during surgery after registration might disrupt the preset navigation measurements, leading to inaccurate targeting. Technical wise, we managed to avoid the drawback of moving the aiming device repeatedly during the procedure, as we will discuss later. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of a simple frameless technique we used in navigation-guided brain biopsy and to show how it refines the accuracy of frameless biopsy procedures. All procedures were performed at our institution in the period from 2018 to 2019 and included 10 patients with different brain lesions. The mean operative time using our technique was noticeably short (18 minutes) and the standard deviation was 2.1. The used technique was easy, undemanding, and reliable in obtaining samples from brain tumors, guaranteeing more precision by applying an all-time fixed and stable navigation reference hardware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.