Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33457086›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2020

Nanovaccine administration route is critical to obtain pertinent iNKt cell help for robust anti-tumor T and B cell responses.

Yusuf Dölen, Michael Valente, Oya Tagit, Eliezer Jäger, Eric A W Van Dinther, N Koen van Riessen, Martin Hruby, Uzi Gileadi, Vincenzo Cerundolo, Carl G Figdor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Delivering CRISPR to the HIV-1 reservoirs.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yusuf DölenDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center & Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michael ValenteDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center & Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Oya TagitDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center & Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eliezer JägerInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry V.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Eric A W Van DintherDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center & Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
N Koen van RiessenDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center & Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Martin HrubyInstitute of Macromolecular Chemistry V.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Uzi GileadiMRC Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Vincenzo CerundoloMRC Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Carl G FigdorDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center & Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11331Cancer Research UK C399/A2291Medical Research Council MC_U137884181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanovaccines, co-delivering antigen and invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cell agonists, proved to be very effective in inducing anti-tumor T cell responses due to their exceptional helper function. However, it is known that iNKT cells are not equally present in all lymphoid organs and nanoparticles do not get evenly distributed to all immune compartments. In this study, we evaluated the effect of the vaccination route on iNKT cell help to T and B cell responses for the first time in an antigen and agonist co-delivery setting. Intravenous administration of PLGA nanoparticles was mainly targeting liver and spleen where iNKT1 cells are abundant and induced the highest serum IFN-y levels, T cell cytotoxicity, and Th-1 type antibody responses. In comparison, after subcutaneous or intranodal injections, nanoparticles mostly drained or remained in regional lymph nodes where iNKT17 cells were abundant. After subcutaneous and intranodal injections, antigen-specific IgG2 c production was hampered and IFN-y production, as well as cytotoxic T cell responses, depended on sporadic systemic drainage. Therapeutic anti-tumor experiments also demonstrated a clear advantage of intravenous injection over intranodal or subcutaneous vaccinations. Moreover, tumor control could be further improved by PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade after intravenous vaccination, but not by intranodal vaccination. Anti PD-1 antibody combination mainly exerts its effect by prolonging the cytotoxicity of T cells. Nanovaccines also demonstrated synergism with anti-4-1BB agonistic antibody treatment in controlling tumor growth. We conclude that nanovaccines containing iNKT cell agonists shall be preferentially administered intravenously, to optimally reach cellular partners for inducing effective anti-tumor immune responses.

Indexed as

Natural Killer T-CellsNeoplasmsAntibodiesB-LymphocytesHumansAntibodies4-1BBCancer vaccinescheckpoint blockadeiNKT cellsnanoparticle biodistributionPD-1

Identifiers

PMID33457086
PMCPMC7790498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.