ArticleOncoimmunology2020
Nanovaccine administration route is critical to obtain pertinent iNKt cell help for robust anti-tumor T and B cell responses.
Article in Oncoimmunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomimetic and personalized nanovaccines in cancer immunotherapy: Design innovations, translational challenges, and future directions.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Rational design of lipid-based nanoparticles for targeted anticancer therapies.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- Concerns and challenges in clinics-guided nanovaccines design and applications.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Vitamin D3 encapsulated in polymeric nanoparticles to dampen the pro-inflammatory immune response.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025Article
- Reprogramming the melanoma and immunosuppressive myeloid cells with esomeprazole-loaded PLGA nanoparticles.iScience · 2025Article
- Recent advances in polymeric nanoparticles for the treatment of hepatic diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Nanotechnology in healthcare, and its safety and environmental risks.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Engineered Cancer Nanovaccines: A New Frontier in Cancer Therapy.Nano-micro letters · 2024Review
- Recent Review on Biological Barriers and Host-Material Interfaces in Precision Drug Delivery: Advancement in Biomaterial Engineering for Better Treatment Therapies.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Review
- Poly(I:C) and R848 ligands show better adjuvanticity to induce B and T cell responses against the antigen(s).Heliyon · 2024Article
- pH and ROS Responsiveness of Polymersome Nanovaccines for Antigen and Adjuvant Codelivery: An In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison.Biomacromolecules · 2024Article
- Delivering CRISPR to the HIV-1 reservoirs.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Crosstalk between trace elements and T-cell immunity during early-life health in pigs.Science China. Life sciences · 2023Review
- Bioinspired Lipid Nanocarriers for RNA Delivery.ACS bio & med chem Au · 2023Review
- Surface-modified nanotherapeutics targeting atherosclerosis.Biomaterials science · 2022Review
- Translating the Manufacture of Immunotherapeutic PLGA Nanoparticles from Lab to Industrial Scale: Process Transfer and In Vitro Testing.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Industrial Scale Manufacturing and Downstream Processing of PLGA-Based Nanomedicines Suitable for Fully Continuous Operation.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Anti-PD-L1 F(ab) Conjugated PEG-PLGA Nanoparticle Enhances Immune Checkpoint Therapy.Nanotheranostics · 2022Article
- Industrialization's eye view on theranostic nanomedicine.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanovaccines, co-delivering antigen and invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cell agonists, proved to be very effective in inducing anti-tumor T cell responses due to their exceptional helper function. However, it is known that iNKT cells are not equally present in all lymphoid organs and nanoparticles do not get evenly distributed to all immune compartments. In this study, we evaluated the effect of the vaccination route on iNKT cell help to T and B cell responses for the first time in an antigen and agonist co-delivery setting. Intravenous administration of PLGA nanoparticles was mainly targeting liver and spleen where iNKT1 cells are abundant and induced the highest serum IFN-y levels, T cell cytotoxicity, and Th-1 type antibody responses. In comparison, after subcutaneous or intranodal injections, nanoparticles mostly drained or remained in regional lymph nodes where iNKT17 cells were abundant. After subcutaneous and intranodal injections, antigen-specific IgG2 c production was hampered and IFN-y production, as well as cytotoxic T cell responses, depended on sporadic systemic drainage. Therapeutic anti-tumor experiments also demonstrated a clear advantage of intravenous injection over intranodal or subcutaneous vaccinations. Moreover, tumor control could be further improved by PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade after intravenous vaccination, but not by intranodal vaccination. Anti PD-1 antibody combination mainly exerts its effect by prolonging the cytotoxicity of T cells. Nanovaccines also demonstrated synergism with anti-4-1BB agonistic antibody treatment in controlling tumor growth. We conclude that nanovaccines containing iNKT cell agonists shall be preferentially administered intravenously, to optimally reach cellular partners for inducing effective anti-tumor immune responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.