Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33456973›Full record

ArticleReaction chemistry & engineering2019

Continuous flow synthesis of a pharmaceutical intermediate: a computational fluid dynamics approach.

Cameron T Armstrong, Cailean Q Pritchard, Daniel W Cook, Mariam Ibrahim, Bimbisar K Desai, Patrick J Whitham, Brian J Marquardt, Yizheng Chen, Jeremie T Zoueu, Michael J Bortner and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reaction chemistry & engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Continuous Extraction of 2-Chloroethyl isocyanate for 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexylurea Purification.Chemical engineering and processing = Genie des procedes = Verfahrenstechnik · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cameron T ArmstrongChemical and Life Science Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23219 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6342-0860
Cailean Q PritchardDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Macromolecules Innovation Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061 USA. E-mail: mbortner@vt.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2775-186x
Daniel W CookChemical and Life Science Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23219 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0621-3624
Mariam IbrahimChemical and Life Science Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23219 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7429-3702
Bimbisar K DesaiChemical and Life Science Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23219 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2288-3126
Patrick J WhithamMarqMetrix, Inc., Seattle, WA, 98103 USA.
Brian J MarquardtMarqMetrix, Inc., Seattle, WA, 98103 USA.
Yizheng ChenChemical and Life Science Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23219 USA.
Jeremie T ZoueuChemical and Life Science Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23219 USA.
Michael J BortnerDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Macromolecules Innovation Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061 USA. E-mail: mbortner@vt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6040-5400
Thomas D RoperChemical and Life Science Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23219 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8923-5505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous flow chemistry has the potential to greatly improve efficiency in the synthesis of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs); however, the optimization of these processes can be complicated by a large number of variables affecting reaction success. In this work, a screening design of experiments was used to compare computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with experimental results. CFD simulations and experimental results both identified the reactor residence time and reactor temperature as the most significant factors affecting product yield for this reaction within the studied design space. A point-to-point comparison of the results showed absolute differences in product yield as low as 2.4% yield at low residence times and up to 19.1% yield at high residence times with strong correlation between predicted and experimental percent yields. CFD was found to underestimate the product yields at low residence times and overestimate at higher residence times. The correlation in predicted product yield and the agreement in identifying significant factors in reaction performance reveals the utility of CFD as a valuable tool in the design of continuous flow tube reactors with significantly reduced experimentation.

Identifiers

PMID33456973
PMCPMC7745113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.