Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33456614›Full record

ArticleJournal of medicine and life

Cytogenetics and Molecular Investigations detect a Mosaic Variant of Turner Syndrome only Suspected by Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Two Case Reports with Negative Ultrasound Examinations.

Francesco Libotte, Sonia Lorena Carpineto, Claudio Dello Russo, Antonella Viola, Katia Margiotti, Fabrizia Restaldi, Antonio Novelli, Alvaro Mesoraca, Claudio Giorlandino

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medicine and life. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco LibotteDepartment of Genetics, Altamedica Fetal Medical Centre, Rome, Italy.
Sonia Lorena CarpinetoDepartment of Genetics, Altamedica Fetal Medical Centre, Rome, Italy.
Claudio Dello RussoDepartment of Genetics, Altamedica Fetal Medical Centre, Rome, Italy.
Antonella ViolaDepartment of Genetics, Altamedica Fetal Medical Centre, Rome, Italy.
Katia MargiottiDepartment of Genetics, Altamedica Fetal Medical Centre, Rome, Italy.
Fabrizia RestaldiDepartment of Genetics, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Antonio NovelliDepartment of Genetics, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Alvaro MesoracaDepartment of Genetics, Altamedica Fetal Medical Centre, Rome, Italy.
Claudio GiorlandinoDepartment of Prenatal Diagnosis, Altamedica Fetal Medical Centre, Rome, Italy.
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITALTA (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal testing has been moving towards non-invasive methods to determine fetal risk for genetic disorders. Numerous studies have focused the attention on common trisomies; although the detection rate (DR) for trisomy 21 is high (over 95%), the accuracy regarding the DR for trisomies 13 and 18 has come under scrutiny. The testing has been applied to sex chromosome aneuploidies, but many studies have shown that it is not as effective as it is for common trisomies. Although non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) has become a standard screening procedure for all pregnant women, invasive sampling procedures remain important in confirming NIPT-positive findings. In the present study, we report discordant results of Turner syndrome (TS) mosaicism between NIPT and karyotyping. A 35-year-old pregnant woman underwent NIPT, and a probable risk for Xp deletion was indicated. Subsequently, amniocentesis was performed. The karyotype was identified as mos 45,X [28]/46,X,i(X)(q1.0)[5]. In the second case, a 33-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis after a positive NIPT that indicated a probable risk for monosomy X. The result was mos 45,X [8]/46,XY[8]. Since NIPT is a screening test, the possibility of false-positive or false-negative results should always be considered. We underline the importance of pre/post detailed counseling. Furthermore, women with abnormal NIPT results should undergo immediate amniocentesis that remains the only tool for a correct diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidies.

Indexed as

Cytogenetic AnalysisGenetic VariationMosaicismPrenatal DiagnosisUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultCell NucleusChromosome BandingDown SyndromeFemaleHumansInterphaseKaryotypingPregnancyTurner SyndromeCounsellingmosaicismnon-invasive prenatal testprenatal diagnosisTurner syndrome

Identifiers

PMID33456614
PMCPMC7803325
OpenAlexW3121226366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.