Assessing Research Ethics Committees in Myanmar: Results of a Self-Assessment Tool.

backgroundHuman subject research has increased in Myanmar since 2010 and accordingly, the establishment of research ethics committees (RECs) have increased to review these research studies. However, characteristics that reflect the operations of RECs in Myanmar have not been assessed.

objectivesTo assess the structures and processes of RECs at Medical Institutions in Myanmar.

methodsWe used a self-assessment tool for RECs operating in low and middle-income countries. This tool consists of the following ten domains: organizational aspects, membership and ethics training, submission arrangements and materials, meeting minutes, policies referring to review procedures, review of specific protocol and informed consent items, communication a decision, continuing review, REC resources, and institutional commitment. We distributed this self-administered questionnaire to RECs from 15 Medical Institutions in Myanmar and one representative from each REC completed this questionnaire and returned it anonymously. We used descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate statistics to analyse the data.

resultsOut of maximum 200 points, the total mean score for Myanmar Medical Institutions was 112.6 ± 12.77, which is lower compared to the aggregate mean score of 137.4 ± 35.8 obtained from RECs in other countries. Domains in which the average percentage score was less than 60% included organizational commitment, membership and ethics training, continuing review and REC resources. Many RECs have a diverse membership and appropriate gender balance but, lacked essential policies.

conclusionThe results show that for Myanmar RECs there is significant room for improvement in their "structures and processes" as well as the extent of institutionl commitment. The self-assessment tool proved to be valuable method to assess the quality of RECs.