ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021
Investigating the efficacy and safety of mineral smectite granules on wound healing.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Topical Application of Siberian Pine Essential Oil Formulations Enhance Diabetic Wound Healing.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mineral smectite granules have traditionally been used for diarrhea and gastrointestinal bleeding; however, the wound healing ability of mineral smectite granules has not been investigated in detail. Therefore, the present study explored the efficacy and safety of mineral smectite granules on wound healing. An excision wound rat model was established. The experimental group was treated with smectite granules, the positive control group was treated with starch and the blank control group was left untreated. Wound closure rates, wound healing times and histopathological analysis were compared among the three groups. The mechanism underlying the effects of mineral smectite granules on wound healing was assessed by performing picrosirius red staining and immunohistochemical staining and measuring hydroxyproline content. Based on wound closure rates, wound healing times and histopathological analysis, the results indicated that rats treated with smectite granules displayed increased wound healing efficacy compared with the other two groups. Investigation of the underlying mechanism suggested that mineral smectite granules could promote wound healing by inducing collagen fiber synthesis and increasing the number of neovessels. The present study indicated the efficacy and safety of mineral smectite granules on wound healing and provided a theoretical basis for its application in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.