Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33456526›Full record

ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021

Pancreatic pseudocyst: Dilemma of its recent management (Review).

Jonathan Hartanto Tan, Wenjie Chin, Abdul Lateef Shaikh, Shusen Zheng

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05568433 (New Biomarkers in the Intracystic Liquid of Cystic Pancreatic Lesions), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05568433 completednot on this map

New Biomarkers in the Intracystic Liquid of Cystic Pancreatic Lesions

TypeobservationalSponsorIuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyRan2018 to 2020Enrolled63ConditionsPancreatic CystArmsEndoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Current Progress in the CT- and MRI-Based Detection and Evaluation of Acute Pancreatitis Complications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Turkish Society of Gastroenterology: Pancreas Working Group, Acute Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan Hartanto TanDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, National Health Commission of China Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China.
Wenjie ChinDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, National Health Commission of China Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China.
Abdul Lateef ShaikhDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, National Health Commission of China Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China.
Shusen ZhengDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, National Health Commission of China Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in radiological techniques have led to an increase in the number of diagnoses of pancreatic pseudocyst, which is the most common pancreatic cyst lesion disease, accounting for two-thirds of all pancreatic cyst lesions. Historically, the management of pancreatic pseudocyst has been achieved through the use of conservative treatments and surgery; however, due to the complications and recurrence rate associated with these techniques, the management of pancreatic pseudocyst is challenging. Surgeons and gastroenterologists have attempted to determine the optimal management technique to treat pancreatic pseudocyst to reduce complications and the recurrence rate. From these investigations, percutaneous catheter, surgical and endoscopic drainage with ultrasonography guidance have become promising management techniques. The present review aimed to summarize the diagnostic and therapeutic methods used for the management of pancreatic pseudocyst and to compare percutaneous catheter, surgical and endoscopic drainage.

Indexed as

drainagemanagementpancreaticpseudocyst

Identifiers

PMID33456526
PMCPMC7792492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.