Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33456210›Full record

ReviewReviews in fish biology and fisheries2022

The future of ocean governance.

Bianca Haas, Mary Mackay, Camilla Novaglio, Liam Fullbrook, Michael Murunga, Carla Sbrocchi, Jan McDonald, Phillipa C McCormack, Karen Alexander, Maree Fudge and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in fish biology and fisheries, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
31.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The super wicked problem of ocean health: a socio-ecological and behavioural perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Deep aspirations: towards a sustainable offshore Blue Economy.Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Empowering her guardians to nurture our Ocean's future.Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2022
    Article
  9. Ocean resource use: building the coastal blue economy.Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Bianca HaasInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7322-2929
Mary MackayCSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS 7004 Australia.
Camilla NovaglioCSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS 7004 Australia.
Liam FullbrookSchool of Social Sciences, College of Arts, Law and Education, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 22, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Michael MurungaInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Carla SbrocchiFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, 2007 Australia.
Jan McDonaldFaculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 89, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Phillipa C McCormackFaculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 89, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Karen AlexanderInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Maree FudgeInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Lyn GoldsworthyInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Fabio BoschettiCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Crawley, WA Australia.
Ian DuttonDepartment of Primary Industries Parks, Water and Environment, GPO Box 44, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Leo DutraCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, St Lucia 4067, Brisbane, QLD Australia.
Jeffrey McGeeInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Yannick RousseauInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Erica SpainInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Robert StephensonCSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS 7004 Australia.
Joanna VinceSchool of Social Sciences, College of Arts, Law and Education, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 22, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Chris WilcoxCSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS 7004 Australia.
Marcus HawardInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Australian Antarctic Division · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AUCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere · AUDepartment of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania · AUUniversity of New Brunswick · CAUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocean governance is complex and influenced by multiple drivers and actors with different worldviews and goals. While governance encompasses many elements, in this paper we focus on the processes that operate within and between states, civil society and local communities, and the market, including industry. Specifically, in this paper, we address the question of how to move towards more sustainable ocean governance aligning with the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the UN Ocean Decade. We address three major risks to oceans that arise from governance-related issues: (1) the impacts of the overexploitation of marine resources; (2) inequitable distribution of access to and benefits from marine ecosystem services, and (3) inadequate or inappropriate adaptation to changing ocean conditions. The SDGs have been used as an underlying framework to develop these risks. We identify five drivers that may determine how ocean governance evolves, namely formal rules and institutions, evidence and knowledge-based decision-making, legitimacy of decision-making institutions, stakeholder engagement and participation, and empowering communities. These drivers were used to define two alternative futures by 2030: (a) 'Business as Usual'-a continuation of current trajectories and (b) 'More Sustainable Future'-optimistic, transformational, but technically achievable. We then identify what actions, as structured processes, can reduce the three major governance-related risks and lead to the More Sustainable Future. These actions relate to the process of co-creation and implementation of improved, comprehensive, and integrated management plans, enhancement of decision-making processes, and better anticipation and consideration of ambiguity and uncertainty. Supplementary information: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11160-020-09631-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Indexed as

ActorsAgencyMarine policyResource managementSustainable development goals

Identifiers

PMID33456210
PMCPMC7802408
OpenAlexW3119553517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.