Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33455878›Full record

ReviewTransfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis2021

CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing for curing sickle cell disease.

So Hyun Park, Gang Bao

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. An engineered β-globin homology donor reveals insights into β-globin expression and betters HDR.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

So Hyun ParkDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, 6500 Main St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Electronic address: shp9n@virginia.edu.
Gang BaoDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, 6500 Main St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Electronic address: gang.bao@rice.edu.
Rice University · US

Funding

HBB gene-editing for treating sickle cell diseaseR01HL152314 · NHLBI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI BAO, GANG · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
Velcro AAV Vector for tissue-specific delivery of genome editing reagents with enhanced cargo capacityUG3HL151545 · NHLBI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI BAO, GANG, LAGOR, WILLIAM RAYMOND · 2019 to 2021
$2.3M
Addressing safety issues by quantify large deletions and chromosomal rearrangements in HBB gene editingOT2HL154977 · NHLBI · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI BAO, GANG · 2020 to 2020
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS OT2 HL154977NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL152314NHLBI NIH HHS UG3 HL151545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common monogenic blood disorder marked by severe pain, end-organ damage, and early mortality. Treatment options for SCD remain very limited. There are only four FDA approved drugs to reduce acute complications. The only curative therapy for SCD is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, typically from a matched, related donor. Ex vivo engineering of autologous hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells followed by transplantation of genetically modified cells potentially provides a permanent cure applicable to all patients regardless of the availability of suitable donors and graft-vs-host disease. In this review, we focus on the use of CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing for curing SCD, including the curative correction of SCD mutation in β-globin (HBB) and the induction of fetal hemoglobin to reverse sickling. We summarize the major achievements and challenges, aiming to provide a clearer perspective on the potential of gene-editing based approaches in curing SCD.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingHumansCRISPR/Cas9Gene editingSickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID33455878
PMCPMC8049447
OpenAlexW3120369081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.