Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33455853›Full record

ReviewJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2023

Examining the Influence of Chemosensation on Laryngeal Health and Disorders.

Carolyn K Novaleski, Richard L Doty, Alissa A Nolden, Paul M Wise, Joel D Mainland, Pamela H Dalton

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Multiple Chemical Sensitivity.Brain sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carolyn K NovaleskiMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: cnova@msu.edu.
Richard L DotyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alissa A NoldenDepartment of Food Science, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Paul M WiseMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Joel D MainlandMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Pamela H DaltonMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

The Structure of Olfactory Neural and Perceptual SpacesU19NS112953 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI RINBERG, DMITRY · 2019 to 2023
$18.4M
INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN THE CHEMICAL SENSEST32DC000014 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI PAMELA HELEN DALTON, Joel D Mainland · 1989 to 2026
$6.2M
Upper Airway Sensory Irritation and Aerodynamic Cough Analysis in Response to Odors and Sensory IrritantsF32DC016805 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI NOVALESKI, CAROLYN K. · 2018 to 2018
$59k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC016805NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000014NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS112953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhaled airborne stimuli are associated with laryngeal disorders affecting respiration. Clinically, several themes emerged from the literature that point to specific gaps in the understanding and management of these disorders. There is wide variation in the types of airborne stimuli that trigger symptoms, lack of standardization in provocation challenge testing using airborne stimuli, and vague reporting of laryngeal symptoms. Scientifically, evidence exists outside the field of voice science that could prove useful to implement among patients with impaired laryngeal-respiration. To expand this area of expertise, here we provide a thematic overview of relevant evidence and methodological tools from the discipline of chemosensory sciences. This review provides distinctions across the three chemosensory systems of olfaction, trigeminal chemesthesis, and gustation, guidance on selecting and delivering common chemosensory stimuli for clinical testing, and methods of quantifying sensory experiences using principles of human psychophysics. Investigating the science of chemosensation reveals that laryngeal responses to inhaled airborne stimuli have explanations involving physiological mechanisms as well as higher cognitive processing. Fortunately, these findings are consistent with current pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for impaired laryngeal-respiration. Based on the close relationships among inhaled airborne stimuli, respiration, and laryngeal function, we propose that new perspectives from chemosensory sciences offer opportunities to improve patient care and target areas of future research.

Indexed as

Laryngeal DiseasesLarynxVoiceHumansRespirationChemical sensesChemosensoryChronic coughLarynxParadoxical vocal fold motionVocal cord dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID33455853
PMCPMC8277875
OpenAlexW3120054027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.