Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33455518›Full record

ArticleJournal of health communication2020

Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?"

Ariel Maschke, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, Nancy R Kressin, Mara A Schonberg, Tracy A Battaglia, Christine M Gunn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health communication, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ariel MaschkeWomen's Health Interdisciplinary Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael K Paasche-OrlowDepartment of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Nancy R KressinDepartment of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Mara A SchonbergBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Tracy A BattagliaWomen's Health Interdisciplinary Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Christine M GunnWomen's Health Interdisciplinary Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Using Community-Engaged Methods to Design a Tool to Promote Informed Breast Cancer Screening Decisions for Low Literacy WomenK07CA221899 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GUNN, CHRISTINE MARIE · 2018 to 2022
$642k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA221899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Starting breast cancer screening at age 40 versus 50 may increase potential harms frequency with a small mortality benefit. Younger women's screening decisions, therefore, may be complex. Shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended for women under 50 and may support women under 55 for whom guidelines vary. How women with limited health literacy (LHL) approach breast cancer screening decision-making is less understood, and most SDM tools are not designed with their input. This phenomenological study sought to characterize mammography counseling experiences among women with LHL and primary care providers (PCPs). Women ages 40-54 with LHL who had no history of breast cancer or mammogram within 9 months were approached before a primary care visit at a safety-net hospital. PCPs at this site were invited to participate. Qualitative interviews explored mammography counseling experiences. Patients also reviewed sample information materials. A constant comparison technique generated four themes salient to 25 patients and 20 PCPs: addressing family history versus comprehensive risk assessment; potential mammography harms discussions; information delivery preferences; and integrating pre-visit information tools. Findings suggest that current counseling techniques may not be responsive to patient-identified needs. Opportunities exist to improve how mammography information is shared and increase accessibility across the health literacy spectrum.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultBreast NeoplasmsCounselingDecision Making, SharedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMammographyMiddle AgedPatientsPhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID33455518
PMCPMC8062298
OpenAlexW3123670209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.