ArticleCancer medicine2021
Clinical significance of genetic alterations in endoscopically obtained pancreatic cancer specimens.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic utility of targeted next-generation sequencing in indeterminate pancreaticobiliary cytology and small biopsy specimens: a prospective cohort study.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Drivers of Pancreatic Cancer: Beyond the Big 4.Cancers · 2025Review
- Current status and issues in genomic analysis using EUS-FNA/FNB specimens in hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancers.Journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Association between homologous recombination gene variants and efficacy of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: prospective multicenter observational study.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Observational
- Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for comprehensive genomic profiling of pancreatic cancer.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound guided interventions in the management of pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Review
- Next-generation sequencing of endoscopically obtained tissues from patients with all stages of pancreatic cancer.Cancer science · 2022Article
- Evaluating Pancreatic and Biliary Neoplasms with Small Biopsy-Based Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Doing More with Less.Cancers · 2022Review
- Mutational profiling of 103 unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas using EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although comprehensive gene analyses of pancreatic cancer provide new knowledge on molecular mechanisms, the usefulness and possibility of the analyses in routinely available clinical samples remain unclear. We assessed the possibility and utility of target sequencing of endoscopically obtained pancreatic cancer samples. Fifty-eight pancreatic cancer patients who underwent EUS-FNA or endoscopic biopsy were enrolled. The extracted DNA quantity was assessed and used for next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 50 cancer-related genes from which gene mutations, copy number alterations, and microsatellite instability (MSI) were extracted via secondary analysis. A median of 19.2 ng (3.8-228) of DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Gene alterations were detected in 55 of 58 samples (94.8%), including all samples with a DNA concentration below the detection limit (n = 11). Four frequently altered genes were KRAS (83%), TP53 (66%), SMAD4 (26%), and PTEN (17%), and molecular targetable genes were detected in 13 cases (22.4%). Five samples (8.6%) had many mutations and suspected MSI with impaired mismatch repair genes. A Cox regression analysis revealed that metastasis (p < 0.005, hazard ratio [HR] 10.1), serum CEA >5 ng/ml (p = 0.01, HR 2.86), ≤10 detected hotspot mutations (p = 0.03, HR 9.86), and intact Ras signaling (p < 0.005, HR 5.57) were associated with a poor pancreatic cancer prognosis. We performed small, targeted sequencing of pancreatic cancer using available samples from real clinical practice and determined the relationship between gene alterations and prognosis to help determine treatment choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.