ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2021
Fouling in ocular devices: implications for drug delivery, bioactive surface immobilization, and biomaterial design.
Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of ocular tolerability and bioavailability of tonabersat transfersomes ex vivo.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Design Characteristics of a Neoteric, Superhydrophilic, Mechanically Robust Hydrogel Engineered To Limit Fouling in the Ocular Environment.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Linoleic Acid-Based Transferosomes for Topical Ocular Delivery of Cyclosporine A.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The last 30 years has seen a proliferation of research on protein-resistant biomaterials targeted at designing bio-inert surfaces, which are prerequisite for optimal performance of implantable devices that contact biological fluids and tissues. These efforts have only been able to yield minimal results, and hence, the ideal anti-fouling biomaterial has remained elusive. Some studies have yielded biomaterials with a reduced fouling index among which high molecular weight polyethylene glycols have remained dominant. Interestingly, the field of implantable ocular devices has not experienced an outflow of research in this area, possibly due to the assumption that biomaterials tested in other body fluids can be translated for application in the ocular space. Unfortunately, progression in the molecular understanding of many ocular conditions has brought to the fore the need for treatment options that necessitates the use of anti-fouling biomaterials. From the earliest implanted horsehair and silk seton for glaucoma drainage to the recent mini telescopes for sight recovery, this review provides a concise incursion into the gradual evolution of biomaterials for the design of implantable ocular devices as well as approaches used to overcome the challenges with fouling. The implication of fouling for drug delivery, the design of immune-responsive biomaterials, as well as advanced surface immobilization approaches to support the overall performance of implantable ocular devices are also reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.