Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021
Application of survival classification and regression tree analysis for identification of subgroups of risk in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02764073 (Bioimpedance Spectroscopy for the Evaluation of Heart Failure - a Comparison With Clinical Assessment, Lung Ultrasonography, Cardiac Biomarkers and Echocardiography), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Bioimpedance Spectroscopy for the Evaluation of Heart Failure - a Comparison With Clinical Assessment, Lung Ultrasonography, Cardiac Biomarkers and Echocardiography
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic models in populations with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Bioimpedance Indices of Fluid Overload and Cardiorenal Outcomes in Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease: a Systematic Review.Journal of cardiac failure · 2022Pooled it
- Noninvasive biometric monitoring technologies for patients with heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis groups of patients with different survival patterns in a population of patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) by using standard methods of heart function assessment, as well as well as utilizing non-traditional approaches for determining hydration and nutritional status in HF patients-lung ultrasonography (LUS) and bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) analysis. Eligible patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 45% were identified via the daily echocardiography assessments. LUS was performed with patients in the supine position, for a total of 28 sites per complete examination. The hydration state and the body composition were assessed using a portable whole-body BIS device. Our study included 151 patients (69.2% males) with a mean age of 67.1 years. During the follow-up 53 (35.1%) patients died. Using the CART algorithm, we identified five groups based on serum sodium, the severity of NYHA class, serum urea and systolic blood pressure. When comparing the two models, the model derived from the CART analysis showed better predictive power than the conventional Cox model (c-index 0.790, 95% CI 0.723-0.857 vs. 0.736, 95%CI 0.664-0.807, p < 0.05). The application of CART analysis allowed us to identify different groups of risk for all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. The use of this type of modelling showed better prediction capabilities over that of using more conventional statistical approach.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02764073.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.