Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33454872›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2022

Reflections on Data Sharing Practices in Spinal Cord Injury Research.

John C Gensel, Michael B Orr

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John C GenselSpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky Medical School, Lexington, KY, USA. gensel.1@uky.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8980-108X
Michael B OrrSpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky Medical School, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5023-8197

Funding

The role of macrophage phenotype and age in spinal cord injuryR01NS091582 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI GENSEL, JOHN C · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Acomys as a Novel Mammalian Model of Spinal Cord InjuryF31NS110264 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ORR, MICHAEL · 2019 to 2019
$35k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS110264NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are few pharmacological therapeutics available for spinal cord injury despite years of preclinical and clinical research. This brief editorial discusses some of the shortcomings of translational research efforts. In addition, we comment on our previous experiences with data curation and highlight evolving efforts by the spinal cord injury research community to improve prospects for future therapeutic development, especially pertaining to preclinical data sharing through the Open Data Commons for Spinal Cord Injury (ODC-SCI).

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesHumansInformation DisseminationTranslational Research, BiomedicalCommunityDatabase designFAIRRepositoryReproducibilityRigorSCI 2020

Identifiers

PMID33454872
PMCPMC8282785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.