ArticleJournal of radiation research2021
Development of raster scanning IMRT using a robotic radiosurgery system.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment time with the CyberKnife frameless radiosurgery system is prolonged due to the motion of the robotic arm. We have developed a novel scanning irradiation method to reduce treatment time. We generated treatment plans mimicking eight-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans generated for the Novalis radiosurgery system. 2D dose planes were generated with multiple static beam spots collimated by a fixed circular cone. The weights of the uniformly distributed beam spots in each dose plane were optimized using the attraction-repulsion model. The beam spots were converted to the scanning speed to generate the raster scanning plan. To shorten treatment time, we also developed a hybrid scanning method which combines static beams with larger cone sizes and the raster scanning method. Differences between the Novalis and the scanning plan's dose planes were evaluated with the criterion of a 5% dose difference. The mean passing rates of three cases were > 85% for cone sizes ≤ 12.5 mm. Although the total monitor units (MU) increased for smaller cone sizes in an inverse-square manner, the hybrid scanning method greatly reduced the total MU, while maintaining dose distributions comparable to those with the Novalis plan. The estimated treatment time of the hybrid scanning with a 12.5 mm cone size was on average 22% shorter than that of the sequential plans. This technique will be useful in allowing the CyberKnife with conventional circular cones to achieve excellent dose distribution with a shortened treatment time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.