Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33454735›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2021

From biomechanics to pathology: predicting axonal injury from patterns of strain after traumatic brain injury.

Cornelius K Donat, Maria Yanez Lopez, Magdalena Sastre, Nicoleta Baxan, Marc Goldfinger, Reneira Seeamber, Franziska Müller, Polly Davies, Peter Hellyer, Petros Siegkas and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cornelius K DonatDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Maria Yanez LopezDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Magdalena SastreDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicoleta BaxanBiological Imaging Centre, Central Biomedical Services, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Marc GoldfingerDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Reneira SeeamberDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Franziska MüllerDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Polly DaviesDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Peter HellyerCentre for Neuroimaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Petros SiegkasDesign Engineering, Imperial College London, UK.
Steve GentlemanDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David J SharpDepartment of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mazdak GhajariRoyal British Legion Centre for Blast Injury Studies, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBRoyal British Legion · GBKing's College London · GBNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Department of Health II-LB-0715-20006Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-048Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between biomechanical forces and neuropathology is key to understanding traumatic brain injury. White matter tracts are damaged by high shear forces during impact, resulting in axonal injury, a key determinant of long-term clinical outcomes. However, the relationship between biomechanical forces and patterns of white matter injuries, associated with persistent diffusion MRI abnormalities, is poorly understood. This limits the ability to predict the severity of head injuries and the design of appropriate protection. Our previously developed human finite element model of head injury predicted the location of post-traumatic neurodegeneration. A similar rat model now allows us to experimentally test whether strain patterns calculated by the model predicts in vivo MRI and histology changes. Using a controlled cortical impact, mild and moderate injuries (1 and 2 mm) were performed. Focal and axonal injuries were quantified with volumetric and diffusion 9.4 T MRI at 2 weeks post injury. Detailed analysis of the corpus callosum was conducted using multi-shell diffusion MRI and histopathology. Microglia and astrocyte density, including process parameters, along with white matter structural integrity and neurofilament expression were determined by quantitative immunohistochemistry. Linear mixed effects regression analyses for strain and strain rate with the employed outcome measures were used to ascertain how well immediate biomechanics could explain MRI and histology changes. The spatial pattern of mechanical strain and strain rate in the injured cortex shows good agreement with the probability maps of focal lesions derived from volumetric MRI. Diffusion metrics showed abnormalities in the corpus callosum, indicating white matter changes in the segments subjected to high strain, as predicted by the model. The same segments also exhibited a severity-dependent increase in glia cell density, white matter thinning and reduced neurofilament expression. Linear mixed effects regression analyses showed that mechanical strain and strain rate were significant predictors of in vivo MRI and histology changes. Specifically, strain and strain rate respectively explained 33% and 28% of the reduction in fractional anisotropy, 51% and 29% of the change in neurofilament expression and 51% and 30% of microglia density changes. The work provides evidence that strain and strain rate in the first milliseconds after injury are important factors in determining patterns of glial and axonal injury and serve as experimental validators of our computational model of traumatic brain injury. Our results provide support for the use of this model in understanding the relationship of biomechanics and neuropathology and can guide the development of head protection systems, such as airbags and helmets.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaModels, NeurologicalAnimalsAstrocytesAxonsBrain Injuries, TraumaticCorpus CallosumDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDisease Models, AnimalFinite Element AnalysisMaleMicrogliaRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyWhite Mattercontrolled cortical impactdiffusion tensor imagingfinite element modellingquantitative histologytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID33454735
PMCPMC7990483
OpenAlexW3125388385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.