ArticleEnvironmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)2021
SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens could be determined in liquid samples from soils.
Article in Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Evaluation of Gradient-Variant Quantum Dot Fluorescence Technology for Rapid Detection ofSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
- Municipal solid waste, an overlooked route of transmission for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2: a review.Environmental chemistry letters · 2023Review
- Environmental challenges of COVID-19 pandemic: resilience and sustainability - A review.Environmental research · 2023Review
- Unfolding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein through infrared and ultraviolet-C radiation based disinfection.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2022Article
- A critical review on diverse technologies for advanced wastewater treatment during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: What do we know?Journal of hazardous materials advances · 2022Review
- Perspective on the status and behaviour of SARS-CoV-2 in soil.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2022Review
- The COVID-19 pandemic and its implications on the environment.Environmental research · 2021Review
- Performance study of a sterilization box using a combination of heat and ultraviolet light irradiation for the prevention of COVID-19.Environmental research · 2021Article
- SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses in soil: An environmental outlook.Environmental research · 2021Review
- SARS-CoV-2 and other main pathogenic microorganisms in the environment: Situation in Galicia and Spain.Environmental research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the current COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 has been quantified in wastewater in various countries, and wastewater based epidemiology has been proposed as a potential early warning tool for new outbreaks. However, even taking into account that poorly treated wastewater and sewage sludge may be spread on soils, there is no published paper dealing with the quantification of the virus in soil-related liquid samples, as could be runoff, leachates, or soil solution. To fill this gap, the authors of this piece propose reflections on the development of a methodological approach for the quantification of SARS-CoV-2 (and eventually other pathogens) in soil-related liquid samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.