Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33454290›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2021

Microgravity effects on the human brain and behavior: Dysfunction and adaptive plasticity.

K E Hupfeld, H R McGregor, P A Reuter-Lorenz, R D Seidler

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Brain displacement and nonlinear deformation following human spaceflight.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [Prospects and technical challenges of non-invasive brain-computer interfaces in manned space missions].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The futuristic manifolds of REM sleep.Journal of sleep research · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. An Update on Neuroaging on Earth and in Spaceflight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K E HupfeldDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
H R McGregorDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
P A Reuter-LorenzDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
R D SeidlerDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States; Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. Electronic address: rachaelseidler@ufl.edu.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training in Movement Disorders and NeurorestorationT32NS082168 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Melissa Jo Armstrong, David E Vaillancourt · 2015 to 2026
$2.8M
NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS082168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging plans for travel to Mars and other deep space destinations make it critical for us to understand how spaceflight affects the human brain and behavior. Research over the past decade has demonstrated two co-occurring patterns of spaceflight effects on the brain and behavior: dysfunction and adaptive plasticity. Evidence indicates the spaceflight environment induces adverse effects on the brain, including intracranial fluid shifts, gray matter changes, and white matter declines. Past work also suggests that the spaceflight environment induces adaptive neural effects such as sensory reweighting and neural compensation. Here, we introduce a new conceptual framework to synthesize spaceflight effects on the brain, Spaceflight Perturbation Adaptation Coupled with Dysfunction (SPACeD). We review the literature implicating neurobehavioral dysfunction and adaptation in response to spaceflight and microgravity analogues, and we consider pre-, during-, and post-flight factors that may interact with these processes. We draw several instructive parallels with the aging literature which also suggests co-occurring neurobehavioral dysfunction and adaptive processes. We close with recommendations for future spaceflight research, including: 1) increased efforts to distinguish between dysfunctional versus adaptive effects by testing brain-behavioral correlations, and 2) greater focus on tracking recovery time courses.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalSpace FlightWeightlessnessBed RestBrainHead-Down TiltHumansAdaptationCompensationHead-down-tilt bed restPlasticitySpaceflight

Identifiers

PMID33454290
PMCPMC9650717
OpenAlexW3120929672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.