Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33454264›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2021

Progression of Myocardial Fibrosis in Nonischemic DCM and Association With Mortality and Heart Failure Outcomes.

Aditya Mandawat, Pairoj Chattranukulchai, Anant Mandawat, Alexander J Blood, Sindhoor Ambati, Brenda Hayes, Wolfgang Rehwald, Han W Kim, John F Heitner, Dipan J Shah and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mechanical stretch reduces fibroblast activation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cardiac fibrosis: from mechanisms and models to medicines.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prognostic impact of angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Article
  20. Left Ventricular Ring-like Pattern: The Arrhythmic Tale of a Scarred Heart.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Aditya MandawatDuke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Pairoj ChattranukulchaiDuke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anant MandawatDepartment of Cardiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Alexander J BloodBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sindhoor AmbatiDuke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Brenda HayesDuke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Wolfgang RehwaldDuke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Han W KimDuke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
John F HeitnerDepartment of Cardiology, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Dipan J ShahMethodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Igor KlemDuke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: igorklem@duke.edu.
Duke University · USDuke Medical Center · USEmory University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHouston Methodist · USKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital · THNewYork–Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical ResearchT32HL069749 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2003 to 2023
$6.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess whether the presence and extent of fibrosis changes over time in patients with nonischemic, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) receiving optimal medical therapy and the implications of any such changes on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and clinical outcomes.

backgroundMyocardial fibrosis on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has emerged as important risk marker in patients with DCM.

methodsIn total, 85 patients (age 56 ± 15 years, 45% women) with DCM underwent serial CMR (median interval 1.5 years) for assessment of LVEF and fibrosis. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; the secondary outcome was a composite of heart failure hospitalization, aborted sudden cardiac death, left ventricular (LV) assist device implantation, or heart transplant.

resultsOn CMR-1, fibrosis (median 0.0 [interquartile range: 0% to 2.6%]) of LV mass was noted in 34 (40%) patients. On CMR-2, regression of fibrosis was not seen in any patient. Fibrosis findings were stable in 70 (82%) patients. Fibrosis progression (increase >1.8% of LV mass or new fibrosis) was seen in 15 patients (18%); 46% of these patients had no fibrosis on CMR-1. Although fibrosis progression was on aggregate associated with adverse LV remodeling and decreasing LVEF (40 ± 7% to 34 ± 10%; p < 0.01), in 60% of these cases the change in LVEF was minimal (<5%). Fibrosis progression was associated with increased hazards for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 3.4 [95% confidence interval: 1.5 to 7.9]; p < 0.01) and heart failure-related complications (hazard ratio: 3.5 [95% confidence interval: 1.5 to 8.1]; p < 0.01) after adjustment for clinical covariates including LVEF.

conclusionsOnce myocardial replacement fibrosis in DCM is present on CMR, it does not regress in size or resolve over time. Progressive fibrosis is often associated with minimal change in LVEF and identifies a high-risk cohort.

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, DilatedHeart FailureAdultAgedFibrosisHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsStroke VolumeVentricular Function, Leftcardiovascular magnetic resonance imagingdilated cardiomyopathymyocardial fibrosisoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID33454264
PMCPMC8254825
OpenAlexW3119216144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.