ArticleThe lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology2021
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the detection and management of colorectal cancer in England: a population-based study.
Article in The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 208 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
208 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 331 citations in OpenAlex.
- Geographical Disparities in Faecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation and Positivity Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of COVID-19 on inflammatory bowel disease surgery: a systematic review.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Pooled it
- The multifaceted impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer care: a systematic review of management disruptions, stage migration, and survival outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Management of left-sided malignant colorectal obstructions with curative intent: a network meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- The safety of colorectal cancer surgery during the COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Decrease of cancer diagnosis during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of epidemiology · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of colon capsule endoscopy accuracy for colorectal cancer screening. An alternative during the Covid-19 pandemic?Journal of medical screening · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Systematic Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic indicator of colorectal cancer recurrence-a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Pooled it
- AGA Rapid Review and Guideline for SARS-CoV2 Testing and Endoscopy Post-Vaccination: 2021 Update.Gastroenterology · 2021Guideline
- Colorectal cancer incidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a non-linear interrupted time-series analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- How Is Colorectal Cancer Care Impacted by Global Crisis in Contrasting Healthcare Systems?-A Descriptive Study From Scotland and Switzerland During the COVID-19 Pandemic.World journal of surgery · 2026Observational
- The early impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to colorectal cancer treatment in Brazil: a spatial and interrupted time-series analysis.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on colon cancer presentations.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on Universal Tumor Screening, Referral Rates and Attendance at Cancer Genetic Counseling at a Safety-Net University Hospital.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Pathology: Comparative Study in Lebanon Before and After the Economic Collapse.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- The impact of extended invitation intervals on stage distribution of screen-detected and interval cancer within the Dutch colorectal cancer screening program.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Changes in clinical presentation, management, and survival outcomes in patients affected by colorectal cancer following COVID-19 pandemic.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on unresectable pancreatic cancer: a regional cohort study in Japan.Fukushima journal of medical science · 2025Article
148 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are concerns that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative effect on cancer care but there is little direct evidence to quantify any effect. This study aims to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the detection and management of colorectal cancer in England.
methodsData were extracted from four population-based datasets spanning NHS England (the National Cancer Cancer Waiting Time Monitoring, Monthly Diagnostic, Secondary Uses Service Admitted Patient Care and the National Radiotherapy datasets) for all referrals, colonoscopies, surgical procedures, and courses of rectal radiotherapy from Jan 1, 2019, to Oct 31, 2020, related to colorectal cancer in England. Differences in patterns of care were investigated between 2019 and 2020. Percentage reductions in monthly numbers and proportions were calculated.
findingsAs compared to the monthly average in 2019, in April, 2020, there was a 63% (95% CI 53-71) reduction (from 36 274 to 13 440) in the monthly number of 2-week referrals for suspected cancer and a 92% (95% CI 89-95) reduction in the number of colonoscopies (from 46 441 to 3484). Numbers had just recovered by October, 2020. This resulted in a 22% (95% CI 8-34) relative reduction in the number of cases referred for treatment (from a monthly average of 2781 in 2019 to 2158 referrals in April, 2020). By October, 2020, the monthly rate had returned to 2019 levels but did not exceed it, suggesting that, from April to October, 2020, over 3500 fewer people had been diagnosed and treated for colorectal cancer in England than would have been expected. There was also a 31% (95% CI 19-42) relative reduction in the numbers receiving surgery in April, 2020, and a lower proportion of laparoscopic and a greater proportion of stoma-forming procedures, relative to the monthly average in 2019. By October, 2020, laparoscopic surgery and stoma rates were similar to 2019 levels. For rectal cancer, there was a 44% (95% CI 17-76) relative increase in the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in April, 2020, relative to the monthly average in 2019, due to greater use of short-course regimens. Although in June, 2020, there was a drop in the use of short-course regimens, rates remained above 2019 levels until October, 2020.
interpretationThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to a sustained reduction in the number of people referred, diagnosed, and treated for colorectal cancer. By October, 2020, achievement of care pathway targets had returned to 2019 levels, albeit with smaller volumes of patients and with modifications to usual practice. As pressure grows in the NHS due to the second wave of COVID-19, urgent action is needed to address the growing burden of undetected and untreated colorectal cancer in England.
fundingCancer Research UK, the Medical Research Council, Public Health England, Health Data Research UK, NHS Digital, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.