ReviewJournal of chromatography. A2021
Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.
Review in Journal of chromatography. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic Workstations in Microextraction Techniques: Technological Evolution and Analytical Impact.Analytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Graphical Visualization Approach for Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography with Parallel Column Arrays.ACS measurement science au · 2026Article
- Review
- Spin coating on a budget: A 3D-Printed all-mechanical alternative for cost-effective thin-film deposition.HardwareX · 2024Article
- The utilization of open-source microcontroller boards and single-board computers in liquid chromatography.Journal of separation science · 2024Review
- An open-source smart fraction collector for isocratic preparative liquid chromatography.HardwareX · 2023Article
- 2LabsToGo─Recipe for Building Your Own Chromatography Equipment Including Biological Assay and Effect Detection.Analytical chemistry · 2022Article
- Development of an Automatable Affinity Purification Process for DNA-Encoded Chemistry.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Capillary Electrophoresis as a Monitoring Tool for Flow Composition Determination.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- [Multimaterial 3D-printed contactless conductivity/laser-induced fluorescence dual-detection cell for capillary electrophoresis].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, a trend toward utilizing open access resources for laboratory research has begun. Open-source design strategies for scientific hardware rely upon the use of widely available parts, especially those that can be directly printed using additive manufacturing techniques and electronic components that can be connected to low-cost microcontrollers. Open-source software eliminates the need for expensive commercial licenses and provides the opportunity to design programs for specific needs. In this review, the impact of the "open-source movement" within the field of chemical separations is described, primarily through a comprehensive look at research in this area over the past five years. Topics that are covered include general laboratory equipment, sample preparation techniques, separations-based analysis, detection strategies, electronic system control, and software for data processing. Remaining hurdles and possible opportunities for further adoption of open-source approaches in the context of these separations-related topics are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.