Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33453591›Full record

ArticleSeizure2021

The perceived impact of COVID-19 and associated restrictions on young people with epilepsy in the UK: Young people and caregiver survey.

Colin Reilly, Amy Muggeridge, J Helen Cross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Seizure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Impact of COVID-19 on Children and Adolescents with Chronic Illness.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Seizure control during the COVID-19 pandemic: Correlating Responsive Neurostimulation System data with patient reports.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Colin ReillyResearch Department, Young Epilepsy, Lingfield, Surrey, RH7 6PW, UK; UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), 30 Guilford Street London WC1N 1EH UK. Electronic address: creilly@youngepilepsy.org.uk.
Amy MuggeridgeResearch Department, Young Epilepsy, Lingfield, Surrey, RH7 6PW, UK.
J Helen CrossResearch Department, Young Epilepsy, Lingfield, Surrey, RH7 6PW, UK; UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), 30 Guilford Street London WC1N 1EH UK; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo garner the views of young people with epilepsy and caregivers regarding the impact of COVID-19 and subsequent restrictions in the UK. MEHODS: An online survey was used to explore the views of young people with epilepsy (n = 71) and caregivers (n = 130) in June 2020. It included questions on the impact of the pandemic and associated restrictions on the child's epilepsy and on child and parental wellbeing.

resultsOne in three young people and 29 % of caregivers reported that the young person's seizures had increased during the pandemic (only 10 % of young people and 8% of caregivers reported a decrease). Half of young people reported that they were more reluctant to go to hospital. Thirty-one percent of young people and 20 % of parents reported difficulties getting epilepsy medication whilst a significant minority of young people (18 %) and caregivers (25 %) reported that the young person had investigations/assessments cancelled by their hospital. The majority of young people reported their sleep (72 %), mood (64 %) and levels of physical activity (53 %) had deteriorated. Caregivers experienced increases in stress (55 %) and anxiety (52 %). Epilepsy nurses were seen as the most helpful support

conclusionsResults indicate that the pandemic and associated restrictions have had a negative impact on young people with epilepsy. Perceived increases in seizures, reluctance to go to hospital and cancelled investigations are likely to impact on epilepsy management. The wider psychosocial impact is also likely to be significant with increases in child and caregiver mental health problems in an already vulnerable group.

Indexed as

AffectCOVID-19ExerciseHealth Services AccessibilitySleepTelemedicineAdolescentAdultAnxietyChildChild, PreschoolEpilepsyFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornBehaviourCOVID-19EpilepsySleep

Identifiers

PMID33453591
PMCPMC7791316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.