Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33453411›Full record

SynthesisMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2021

Ethical Principles, Constraints and Opportunities in Clinical Proteomics.

Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Peter V Treit, Philipp E Geyer, Gilbert S Omenn, Matthias Mann

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. MS-Based Proteomics of Body Fluids: The End of the Beginning.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identifying individuals using proteomics: are we there yet?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Advances and Utility of the Human Plasma Proteome.Journal of proteome research · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sebastian Porsdam MannDepartment of Media, Cognition and Communication, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Uehiro Center for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; New address: Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: sebastian.porsdammann@philosophy.ox.ac.uk.
Peter V TreitDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Philipp E GeyerDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany; NNF Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; New address: OmicEra Diagnostics GmbH, Planegg, Germany.
Gilbert S OmennDepartments of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, Internal Medicine, Human Genetics, and School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Matthias MannDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany; NNF Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: sebastian.porsdammann@philosophy.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
University of Michigan Proteogenomics Data Analysis CenterU24CA210967 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHINNAIYAN, ARUL M, DHANASEKARAN, SARAVANA M · 2016 to 2020
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA210967NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics have vastly increased the quality and scope of biological information that can be derived from human samples. These advances have rendered current workflows increasingly applicable in biomedical and clinical contexts. As proteomics is poised to take an important role in the clinic, associated ethical responsibilities increase in tandem with impacts on the health, privacy, and wellbeing of individuals. We conducted and here report a systematic literature review of ethical issues in clinical proteomics. We add our perspectives from a background of bioethics, the results of our accompanying paper extracting individual-sensitive results from patient samples, and the literature addressing similar issues in genomics. The spectrum of potential issues ranges from patient re-identification to incidental findings of clinical significance. The latter can be divided into actionable and unactionable findings. Some of these have the potential to be employed in discriminatory or privacy-infringing ways. However, incidental findings may also have great positive potential. A plasma proteome profile, for instance, could inform on the general health or disease status of an individual regardless of the narrow diagnostic question that prompted it. We suggest that early discussion of ethical issues in clinical proteomics can ensure that eventual healthcare practices and regulations reflect the considered judgment of the community and anticipate opportunities and problems that may arise as the technology matures.

Indexed as

ProteomicsHumansIncidental FindingsMass Spectrometrybioethicsbiomedical dataclinical proteomicsidentifiabilityincidental findingsproteomicssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33453411
PMCPMC7950205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.