Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33453392›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2021

Bisindolylmaleimide IX: A novel anti-SARS-CoV2 agent targeting viral main protease 3CLpro demonstrated by virtual screening pipeline and in-vitro validation assays.

Yash Gupta, Dawid Maciorowski, Samantha E Zak, Krysten A Jones, Rahul S Kathayat, Saara-Anne Azizi, Raman Mathur, Catherine M Pearce, David J Ilc, Hamza Husein and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. InhibitingPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Antiviral Potential of Plants against COVID-19 during Outbreaks-An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Novel Drug Design for Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Review
  14. Homology Modeling,Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Yash GuptaInfectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Dawid MaciorowskiLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Samantha E ZakUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD, USA; The Geneva Foundation, 917 Pacific Avenue, Tacoma, WA 98402, USA.
Krysten A JonesDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, 5801 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rahul S KathayatDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, 5801 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL, USA.
Saara-Anne AziziDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, 5801 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL, USA.
Raman MathurLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Catherine M PearceLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
David J IlcLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hamza HuseinLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andrew S HerbertThe Geneva Foundation, 917 Pacific Avenue, Tacoma, WA 98402, USA.
Ajay BhartiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, 92093, USA.
Brijesh RathiLaboratory for Translational Chemistry and Drug Discovery, Hansraj College, University of Delhi, India.
Ravi DurvasulaInfectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Daniel P BeckerLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bryan C DickinsonDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, 5801 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL, USA.
John M DyeUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD, USA; The Geneva Foundation, 917 Pacific Avenue, Tacoma, WA 98402, USA. Electronic address: john.m.dye1.civ@mail.mil.
Prakasha KempaiahInfectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. Electronic address: kempaiah.prakasha@mayo.edu.
Loyola University Chicago · USUniversity of Chicago · USThe Geneva Foundation · USWinnMed · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 consists of several enzymes with essential functions within its proteome. Here, we focused on repurposing approved and investigational drugs/compounds. We targeted seven proteins with enzymatic activities known to be essential at different stages of the viral cycle including PLpro, 3CLpro, RdRP, Helicase, ExoN, NendoU, and 2'-O-MT. For virtual screening, energy minimization of a crystal structure of the modeled protein was carried out using the Protein Preparation Wizard (Schrodinger LLC 2020-1). Following active site selection based on data mining and COACH predictions, we performed a high-throughput virtual screen of drugs and investigational molecules (n = 5903). The screening was performed against viral targets using three sequential docking modes (i.e., HTVS, SP, and XP). Virtual screening identified ∼290 potential inhibitors based on the criteria of energy, docking parameters, ligand, and binding site strain and score. Drugs specific to each target protein were further analyzed for binding free energy perturbation by molecular mechanics (prime MM-GBSA) and pruning the hits to the top 32 candidates. The top lead from each target pool was further subjected to molecular dynamics simulation using the Desmond module. The resulting top eight hits were tested for their SARS-CoV-2 anti-viral activity in-vitro. Among these, a known inhibitor of protein kinase C isoforms, Bisindolylmaleimide IX (BIM IX), was found to be a potent inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2. Further, target validation through enzymatic assays confirmed 3CLpro to be the target. This is the first study that has showcased BIM IX as a COVID-19 inhibitor thereby validating our pipeline.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCoronavirus 3C ProteasesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Delivery SystemsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug RepositioningHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansIndolesMaleimidesMolecular Docking SimulationProtein Structure, SecondaryReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Antiviral Agentsbisindolylmaleimide IXCoronavirus 3C ProteasesIndolesMaleimides3CLpro enzymatic assayAnti-Viral assayBisindolylmaleimide (BIM) IXCOVID-19Drug repurposingMD simulationsMM-GBSAPLpro, 3CLpro, RdRP, Helicase, ExoN, NendoU, and 2′-O-MTSARS-CoV-2Virtual screening

Identifiers

PMID33453392
PMCPMC7807167
OpenAlexW3121049453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.